Here are The Pre-Events Warming Up for #FIFAfrica25

FIFAfrica |

In the lead-up to the Forum on Internet Freedom in Africa (FIFAfrica25), a series of pre-events will set the stage for engaging discussions and actions. These sessions set to be held between September 22-24, 2025, serve as a build-up to the Forum by creating avenues for deeper engagement with critical themes that resonate with the content of the Forum. This year, a diverse range of partners have established a series of pre-event sessions focused on various aspects of digital rights, governance, and advocacy across Africa with the goal of addressing the evolving digital landscape. Several common themes emerge from the upcoming pre-event sessions, which are by invitation or by registration.

Find the full list of Pre-events below (Some limited slots are open for registration) | Find the full FIFAfrica Agenda here

Various pre-event sessions include inter-organisational collaboration and capacity building within African networks. These include meetings to be hosted by the African Internet Rights Alliance (AIRA), Digital Rights Alliance Africa (DRAA), and the Association for Progressive Communications (APC).

Some sessions place a significant focus on understanding and influencing digital rights and data governance. This includes training National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and human rights, preparing them for regional consultations on protecting digital civic space from human rights harms. Meanwhile, a session on the “United Voices: Media & Civil Society for African Data Governance” will address how the pervasive nature of datafication has fractured the symbiotic relationship between media and civil society. A session on “Gender Transformative Data Governance in Africa” will highlight the need for a gender-responsive approach to data governance, built upon addressing the minimal representation of diverse gender perspectives and the dominance of private sector interests.

A series of litigation surgeries hosted by Media Defense will be dedicated towards building expertise and capacity among lawyers across Sub-Saharan Africa to protect and advance freedom of expression. Participants will receive expert-led training on international and regional legal frameworks, engage in collaborative case analysis, and strengthen their ability to litigate before national courts and international human rights bodies.

Some pre-events are dedicated towards amplifying the achievements of leveraging advocacy and international mechanisms such as the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) to advance digital rights. These sessions hosted by the Civil Alliance for Digital Empowerment (CADE), Small Media, and CIPESA, aim to build the digital advocacy capacities of civil society and policymakers in Africa. These efforts are also extended to the youth and will see the European Partnership for Democracy (EPD) host an advocacy training for young activists on the African Union system.

An Africa Regional Consultation on Global Policy and Legal Action, collaboratively hosted by the Danish Human Rights Institute, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), and CIPESA, aims to provide clarity on state obligations and company responsibilities regarding digitally mediated human rights harms, supporting civil society advocacy against disinformation and the shrinking of democratic/civic space. The “Spaces of Solidarity (SoS) Forum”, hosted by DW Akademie, also focuses on compiling and updating advocacy positions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including the impact of shrinking international funding. The “African MILE Production” workshop, also hosted by DW Akademie further promotes open exchange on media production, digital campaigning, and cross-border collaboration to strengthen regional media impact.

FIFAfrica25 will also be the home for a “Digital Rights Academy” hosted by NamTushwe and Paradigm Initiative (PIN). The Academy aims to raise awareness and knowledge of digital rights and inclusion, enhancing stakeholders’ capacity to foster inclusive and rights-respecting legislation in their countries.

Digital resilience is a key component of the Forum and also features as a key component of several pre-event sessions including the “Africa Cybersecurity Advocacy Workshop” hosted by the Internet Society (ISOC) a “Digital Security and Localization Workshop” hosted by the Localization Lab. Both sessions are aimed at enhancing digital skills and practices amongst various stakeholders. There is also a led session on “From Harm to Justice: Reimagining Digital Safety for Women and Girls in Africa,” which explores the increasing incidence of online gender-based violence (TFGBV), including image-based abuse and algorithmic amplification of harmful content, and how systemic inequality and weak legal enforcement contribute to these harms.

Line-up of Pre-Events at FIFAfrica25 (Full details can be found in the Agenda)
September 22, 2025 
Pre-Event NameHost/s
Litigation SurgeryMedia Defense
Safety of Voices Meeting Association for Progressive Communications (APC)
United Voices: Media & Civil Society for African Data GovernanceData Governance in Africa Research Fund, Media Institute of Southern Africa, Namibia Media Foundation and DW Akademie.
September 23, 2025
NHRI Training on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Human RightsDanish Human Rights Institute and CIPESA (Register – limited slots available)
Litigation SurgeryMedia Defense
Digitalise Youth Project: Advocacy TrainingEuropean Partnership for Democracy (EPD)
Annual Convening and Capacity BuildingAfrican Internet Rights Alliance (AIRA)
Africa Cybersecurity Advocacy WorkshopInternet Society (ISOC)
Spaces of Solidarity Forum: Strategic Dialogue on the Policy Agenda in Southern AfricaDW Akademie
From Harm to Justice: Reimagining Digital Safety for Women and Girls in AfricaEquality Now  (Register – limited slots available)
Africa Members MeetingAssociation for Progressive Communications (APC)
Amplifying Achievements of Digital Rights Advocacy through the Universal Periodic Review (UPR): Testimonies from our PartnersCADE, Small Media and CIPESA  (Register – limited slots available)
Digital Rights Alliance Africa (DRAA) Member MeetingInternational Centre for Non-for-Profit Law (ICNL) and CIPESA
Digital Security and Localization WorkshopLocalization Lab, the Digital Society of Africa and NamTushwe
September 24, 2025
Africa Regional Consultation on Global Policy and Legal ActionDanish Human Rights Institute, International Commission of Jurists
 (ICJ) and CIPESA  (Register – limited slots available)
Litigation SurgeryMedia Defense
Digitalise Youth Project: Consortium MeetingEuropean Partnership for Democracy (EPD)
Annual Convening and Capacity BuildingAfrican Internet Rights Alliance (AIRA)
Africa Cybersecurity Advocacy WorkshopInternet Society (ISOC)
Digital Rights AcademyNamTushwe and Paradigm Initiative (PIN)
Gender Transformative Data Governance in AfricaPollicy
African MILE Production: Putting the Advocacy Message into Practice!DW Akademie
AFEX Member MeetingMedia Foundation for West Africa (MFWA)
Amplifying Achievements of Digital Rights Advocacy through the Universal Periodic Review (UPR): Testimonies from our Partners CADE, Small Media and CIPESA (Register – limited slots available)
Digital Rights Alliance Africa (DRAA) Member MeetingInternational Centre for Non-for-Profit Law (ICNL) and CIPESA

CIPESA Delivers Training to Ugandan Editors on AI in the Newsroom

By CIPESA Writer |

Artificial intelligence (AI)-related legal and national policy frameworks were the focus for Ugandan editors at an August 20, 2025, workshop organised by the Uganda Editors Guild and World Association of News Publishers (WAN IFRA). The training deliberated on responsible adoption of AI tools by newsrooms and saw participants brainstorm how to effectively navigate the complexities that AI poses to the media industry and the practice of journalism.

WAN-IFRA WIN Deputy Executive, Operations, Jane Godia emphasised that artificial intelligence is evolving rapidly and media houses can no longer afford to ignore the shift. “What we’re really focused on is how to embrace AI in ways that strengthen the core of journalism, and not to replace it, but to enhance its usage while safeguarding credibility and editorial independence,” she said.

Godia urged newsrooms to develop clear AI policies to guide ethical and responsible reporting in this new era in order to promote meaningful conversations about establishing practical, well-defined policies that harness the power of AI without compromising journalistic ethics.

At the workshop, the Collaboration on International ICT for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) presentations focused on the state of artificial intelligence regulation and noted with concern, the lack of an AI-specific legislation in the country. However, there are several laws and policies in which provisions that touch the application and use of AI can be drawn. CIPESA highlighted existing legal frameworks enabling AI deployment, current regulatory gaps, and the consequent implications of AI on newsrooms.

The key legal instruments highlighted include the Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act enacted in 2019, which provides for the protection and regulation of personal data, and whose data protection rights and principles apply to processing of data by AI systems. Section 27 of this Act specifically provides for rights related to automated decision-making, which brings the application of AI directly under the section.

The other instruments discussed include the Copyright and Neighboring Rights Act, which protects the rights of proprietors and authors from unfair use, and the National Payment Systems Act, which regulates payment systems and grants the Central Bank regulatory oversight over payments. Furthermore, the National Information Technology Authority, Uganda (NITA-U) Act establishes the National Information Technology Authority with a mandate to enhance public service delivery and to champion the transformation of livelihoods of Ugandans using information and communication technologies (ICT). While these laws do not specifically mention AI, some of their provisions can be utilised to regulate AI-related practices and processes.

Other laws discussed include the Uganda Communications Act enacted in 2013, which establishes the Uganda Communications Commission as the communications sector regulator that, among others, oversees the deployment of AI in the sector. Meanwhile, the Regulation of Interception of Communications Act (RICA) enacted in 2010, requires telecommunication service providers in section 8(1)(b) to aid interception of communications by installing hardware and software, which are essentially AI manned. Also relevant is the Anti-Terrorism Act provides for the interception of communication for persons suspected to be engaged in perpetration of acts of terrorism and the Computer Misuse Act provides for several offences committed using computers.

In addition to the laws, various AI-linked policy frameworks were also presented. These include Vision 2040, which is intended to drive Uganda into a middle-income status country by 2040; the National Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) Strategy (2020), which aims to position Uganda as a continental hub for 4IR technologies by 2040; and Uganda’s third National Development Plan (NDP III), which is a comprehensive framework to guide the country’s development. These strategic frameworks cover some areas of Machine Learning and AI integration by virtue of being technology-oriented.

Making reference to the Artificial Intelligence in Eastern Africa Newsrooms report, Edrine Wanyama,  Programmes Manager-Legal at CIPESA, highlighted the advantages of AI in newsrooms as extending to increased increased productivity and efficiency in task performance, decrease in daily workload, faster reporting of news stories, quicker fact-checks and detection of disinformation and misinformation patterns.

On the flip side, the workshop also highlighted the current risks associated with use of AI in newsrooms, including facilitating disinformation and misinformation, the tradeoff of accuracy for speed by journalists and editors, over-reliance on AI tools at the cost of individual creativity, the erosion of journalistic ethics and integrity, and the threat of job loss that looms over journalists and editors.

Dr. Peter G. Mwesige, Chief of Party at CIPESA, urged editors to think beyond what AI can do for journalists and newsrooms, and treat AI itself as a beat to be covered critically. Citing trends from other markets, he observed that media coverage is often incomplete, swinging between hype and alarm, and called for explanatory, evidence-based reporting on the promise and limits of AI. He noted that one of AI’s most compelling capabilities is processing large data sets, such as election results, rapidly and at scale.

On the ethical front, Dr. Mwesige emphasised the need for transparency, saying journalists should disclose material use of AI in significant editorial tasks. He urged newsrooms to adopt clear internal policies or integrate AI guidance into existing editorial guidelines.

Dr. Mwesige concluded that while AI can assist with brainstorming story ideas, editing, and transcription, among others, “journalists must still put in the hard work.”
Following the deliberations, CIPESA presented recommendations that challenged the use of AI in the newsroom and the protection of the participants, if AI is to be used meaningfully and ethically without compromising integrity and professionalism.

  • Ethically use AI by, among others, complying with acceptable standards such as the Paris Charter on AI, respect for copyright and acknowledge sources of works.
  • In collaboration with other newsrooms and media houses, develop best practices including policies to guide the integration and application of AI in their work.
  • Media houses should collaboratively invest resources in training journalists in responsible and ethical use of AI.
  • Employ and deploy the use of fact-checkers to deal with information disorders like misinformation, disinformation and deepfakes.
  • Respect other people’s rights, such as intellectual property rights and the right to privacy, while using AI.
  • Use AI under the exercise of extra caution when generating content to avoid cases of unethical usage that often undermines journalism’s ethical standards.
  • Prioritise human oversight over the application and use of AI to ensure that all cases of excessive intrusion by AI are ironed out and a human aspect is added to generated content.

CIPESA and PALU Challenge Rwanda to Address Digital Rights Gaps in UPR Review

By Edrine Wanyama |

Rwanda’s digital rights record has been assessed by the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) and the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) in a joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council. The review contributes to the efforts of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism to strengthen human and digital rights within the country. Notably, the review underscores the urgent need for reforms to safeguard freedom of expression, privacy, and digital inclusion in the face of evolving technologies and governance challenges.

The report highlights positive progress such as the enactment of the Data Protection and Privacy Law (Law No. 058/2021) which protects individuals’ data and establishes the Rwanda National Cyber Security Authority (NCSA) to oversee personal data management. The report also notes the establishment of the Irembo platform, which serves as a basis for enhancing access to public services.

Through the National Strategy for Transformation (NST2) for the period 2024 to 2029, the Rwanda government aims to attain 100% e-service access for Rwandans by 2030, including through enhancing digital skills and literacy under the Digital Ambassadors Programme. There have also been concerted efforts aimed to ensure the financial inclusion of women.

Nevertheless, fundamental freedoms, including free expression, access to information, assembly and association, remain severely restricted in the country. The report observes elevated and systematic threats and intimidation, harassment, arrests and detention and prosecution of government opponents and critics, human rights defenders (HRDs), journalists, and other online activists. This has had a chilling effect on the exercise of freedoms. Access to several websites has been blocked on government orders, while victims of government wrath are often slapped with lengthy prison sentences, which also serves as a tool to silence those who do not agree with the government.

Digital inclusion is also still a major challenge, especially for women, persons with disabilities and the rural populace. According to the report, digital inclusion continues to have adverse effects on the exercise of online rights and freedoms, although the country has a high broadband coverage (99%). Smart phone penetration remains low at 22% and the majority of citizens do not use the internet. The high taxes and high internet costs have further aggravated the inclusion gap.

In terms of its data protection landscape, the report acknowledges the positive step of enacting the Data Protection Act, but notes that the law is weak, lacks strong safeguards such as judicial oversight, and contains a substantively less effective redress mechanism.

Moreover, the report underscores that there is enhanced surveillance of individuals and their communications using sophisticated spyware and malware, such as NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware, and the extensive Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) networks. The surveillance has been deployed to target, threaten and intimidate journalists and other critics.

The report makes several recommendations to the committee to consider if the human rights record of Rwanda in online spaces is to be improved. These recommendations call on the government of Rwanda to:

  • Decriminalise defamation and review vague laws used to suppress freedom of expression and peaceful dissent.
  • Establish independent oversight over surveillance practices and introduce judicial safeguards to protect privacy.
  • Strengthen the implementation of the Access to Information law and ensure that public bodies proactively disclose information.
  • Enhance the capacity of the Rwanda National Cyber Security Authority to enforce data protection while ensuring its independence from executive interference.
  • Promote inclusive digital access, especially for women, persons with disabilities, and rural communities.
  • Cease censorship and arbitrary removal of online content, and establish transparent mechanisms for content moderation.
  • Establish a favourable and safe environment for operations of human rights defenders, journalists and other online activists as opposed to persecuting them by repealing or amending laws to provide for rights-respecting provisions.
  • Prohibit and penalise tech-facilitated gender-based violence especially against women and ensure their access to timely and effective redress.
  • Investigate all cases of enforced disappearance, ensuring punishment for any perpetrators and justice for survivors and their family members.
  • Make strong and repeated public statements at the highest government levels to make clear that all law enforcement authorities and investigation agencies should comply with the law, and that all detained people must be brought to court within 24 hours.
  • Embrace universal design and ensure its full integration into the IremboGov platform to cater for and ensure that persons with disabilities especially visual impairments have full access to all of its services.

  See full Report here.

Claiming Digital Rights in Uganda’s Business Sector

By CIPESA Writer |

In an era where digital technologies are reshaping every sector including health, agriculture, finance, education and the labour market, Uganda is fast-tracking its ambition to become a fully connected, inclusive digital society. Yet, as the country rolls out its Digital Transformation Roadmap, critical questions remain: Who is being left behind? Who bears the cost of connecting the unconnected? How do we ensure that technological innovation does not come at the expense of human rights protection?

These were the central concerns at the inaugural National Business and Digital Rights Policy Dialogue hosted by the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) on July 23, 2025. The event brought together 55 participants comprising policymakers, innovators, civil society, the private sector, and development partners to explore how Uganda’s digital transformation is affecting human rights, especially data protection, privacy, access, and equity. The dialogue reviewed not just Uganda’s      progress, but the power dynamics, policy gaps, and human rights risks shaping digitalisation in business.

The Digital Vision vs. The Digital Reality

Uganda’s Digital Transformation Roadmap sets bold targets: 90% household connectivity, nationwide broadband coverage, and widespread e-service access by 2040. Progress is visible, with over 4,000km of national optical fibre infrastructure laid, and more than 100 digital public services rolled out. Yet, beneath these achievements, gaps in digital literacy, access and utility, as well as funding constraints, persist.

According to the 2024 National Population and Housing Census, Uganda’s population stands at 45.9 million, of whom 50.5% are under the age of 18, representing a massive youth cohort born into a digital world yet often lacking affordable internet access and digital tools. Connectivity gaps are further shaped by geography, with over 75% of the population living in rural areas where infrastructure is limited.

On the gender lens, women who comprise 23.4 million of the population, slightly outnumbering men at 22.5 million, continue to disproportionately face digital access barriers. These range from high data costs, low digital literacy, and limited access to devices and digital infrastructure, especially in rural and remote districts. As one of the panelists during the policy dialogue noted, “Digital transformation is moving fast, but our institutions and communities are not always keeping pace.”

Meanwhile, the informal sector, which employs approximately 80-92% of the country’s workforce, remains largely invisible in national digital strategies and compliance frameworks. This informal sector significantly overlaps with Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), which are central to Uganda’s economic growth, yet they often operate without proper tools to secure user data or navigate the evolving digital compliance landscape due to limited awareness, resources, and technical capacity.

As businesses digitise, their responsibility to protect users’ rights increases. However, many of them lack the knowledge to protect these rights. Uganda’s laws and enforcement mechanisms also have gaps. As a result, there is weak oversight over fintech platforms and digital lenders, low awareness and implementation of the Data Protection and Privacy Act, rampant digital surveillance, and gendered digital harms, including online harassment.

Data Is Power but Who Holds It?

Uganda’s fast-growing population is generating an unprecedented amount of personal data. The 2024 population census itself relied on tablet-based digital enumeration for the first time. However, while digital data collection is expanding, data governance is not keeping pace. The Personal Data Protection Office (PDPO) and National Information Technology Authority Uganda (NITA-U) are key players, but capacity and resourcing gaps persist. If left unaddressed, digital innovation risks entrenching inequality, with vulnerable populations, especially refugees, informal workers, and low-income women, paying the price for systems that were not designed with their rights in mind.      

Digital Rights are Human Rights

The future of work in the advent of technology emerged as a key aspect of digital rights, with Moses Okello of the National Organisation of Trade Unions (NOTU) warning that Uganda’s labour laws have not kept pace with the rise of gig work and digital employment. Millions of informal workers remain unprotected and unaware of their rights in the digital economy. He called for urgent legal reforms and a national strategy that integrates labour protections into digital policy, while urging stronger collaboration with civil society to build grassroots awareness and empower workers to navigate digital transitions.

Ruth Ssekindi, Director at the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), underscored the commission’s constitutional duty to uphold human rights across both state and private sectors, particularly in Uganda’s fast-evolving digital landscape. She highlighted growing concerns over digital rights violations including uninformed data consent, artificial intelligence (AI) manipulation, child exploitation, and poor data security, noting that these challenges disproportionately affect vulnerable populations amid low digital literacy and weak enforcement.

Ssekindi called on businesses to embrace a broader duty of care that goes beyond tax compliance and profit, stressing the need to respect, protect, and remedy digital rights violations. She also pointed to the persistent gender gap in digital access and urged greater inclusion of women and marginalised communities in digital development. While the UHRC plays a key role in shaping digital governance through legal review, education, and policy oversight, she noted that the commission must be adequately resourced, empowered and supported to effectively fulfil its mandate in the digital age.

The dialogue reinforced a clear message that connectivity alone is not enough. Uganda must build an inclusive digital economy anchored in justice, transparency, and community voice. This means empowering watchdog institutions like the PDPO, updating outdated laws and regulations, investing in digital literacy, especially for youths and women, and supporting civic participation in digital policy-making.

In direct response, CIPESA launched the #BeeraSharp (translated as “Be Smart”) campaign. This initiative aims to equip Ugandan businesses with the knowledge and tools to act responsibly in the digital space. #BeeraSharp champions a culture of accountability, urging businesses to take charge of how they collect, store, share, and protect user data. It also promotes understanding of legal obligations under Uganda’s Data Protection and Privacy Act, while encouraging ethical digital conduct across sectors.

A Digital Future for All?

As Uganda ramps up its digitalisation agenda and embraces emerging technologies such as AI and robotics, businesses, policymakers, and civil society must work hand in hand to ensure Uganda’s digital revolution is not just a story of innovation but also a story of inclusion and respect for human rights. As the dialogue closed, one key takeaway stood out: Uganda’s digital future must be intentionally inclusive and rights-driven. Achieving this will require cross-sector collaboration to scale digital skills, reform of outdated laws, more financial and capacity support to institutions like UHRC, NITA-U and the PDPO to protect data rights, and empowering communities through digital literacy, local innovation, and inclusive governance.

CIPESA Submits Report on the State of Digital Rights in Liberia to the Universal Periodic Review

By Edrine Wanyama |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) and the West Africa ICT Action Network (WAICTANET) have submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council a report that shines a light on Liberia’s human rights record in the digital domain. The report documents developments in Liberia’s digital civic space and offers key information to countries and other stakeholders involved in scrutinising Liberia’s performance under the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism.

The UPR process offers all United Nations (UN) member states the opportunity to declare what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situation in their countries and to fulfil their human rights obligations. The report notes that while Liberia has taken some steps to promote the realisation of digital rights, it maintains regressive laws, such as the 1978 Penal Code, and there have been instances of curtailment of rights.

According to Patricia Ainembabazi, Policy and Advocacy Officer at CIPESA, this report is essential for tracking the progress made by Liberia in protecting and promoting human rights in online spaces in accordance with domestic, regional and international obligations. She added: “The report forms the basis for identifying opportunities and shaping the human rights situation to enable the realisation of civil liberties in online spaces. Liberia should take these observations seriously and undertake the necessary reforms.”

The report notes that since Liberia was last reviewed in 2020, it has made some progressive steps towards recognising the importance of online spaces and enacted the Kamara Abdullah Kamara Act on Press Freedom which, among others, decriminalises defamation. It has also taken strides to enhance child protection online and to promote gender equality.

Nevertheless, evidence over the years shows a clear onslaught on the digital civic space, with targeted actions against journalists, human rights defenders (HRDs) and activists. These actors often face intimidation and threats, arrests, detention and lengthy prison sentences that are often enabled by laws that are overly broad and ambiguous. In other cases, there have been violent attacks and unresolved deaths of journalists under suspicious situations including assault. These actions have cast a chill on freedom of expression and led to self-censorship by journalists and HRDs and online activists.

Liberia does not have a specific law on data protection, although a validation of the draft law was conducted in late 2024. Since Liberia does not have a data protection authority, individuals’ data remains vulnerable to misuse by unscrupulous individuals, yet there are limited avenues for legal redress for aggrieved parties.

Furthermore, data protection standards in the country fall short of regional and international data protection standards such as those prescribed by the African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection – which Liberia is yet to ratify.

Meanwhile, Liberia continues to grapple with high levels of digital exclusion due to poverty, digital illiteracy and the concentration of digital access in urban centres.

The report calls upon the Liberian government to:

  1. Repeal all restrictive laws and provisions that criminalise speech and undermine freedom of expression, including section 11.11 of the Penal Law, which penalises individuals for publicly accusing the President of misconduct, even if the accusation is true; section 11.12 on sedition that broadly criminalises acts deemed as incitement against the government; and section 11.14 on criminal malevolence that targets statements which could harm the reputation of public officials. These provisions deter investigative journalism and public accountability.
  2. Expedite the enactment of a specific law on data protection to safeguard and protect personal data. Additionally, ratify and domesticate the Malabo Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection to show commitment to cyber security and personal data protection.
  3. Amend the Freedom of Information Act to strengthen enforcement and ensure greater accessibility to public information. The law should include clear, enforceable penalties for public officials who unjustifiably deny access to information, and establish mechanisms for timely, proactive disclosure by government bodies.
  4. Codify legal safeguards for internet freedom by explicitly protecting online expression within the provisions of the Telecommunications Act 2007, and fast-track the enactment of the Cybercrime Act.
  5. Empower the Independent National Commission on Human Rights (INCHR), by among others, increasing human and financial resources to enhance and facilitate its role in promoting and protecting human rights.
  6. Enhance the capacity of judicial officers and law enforcement officers on online freedoms.
  7. Implement strict protocols preventing the arbitrary arrest or harassment of journalists for their work, and train security forces in this regard.
  8. Comprehensively investigate and prosecute all cases of abuse and killing of journalists to ensure that justice is served.
  9. Enact a specific law on the protection of children’s privacy, protection against online violence, exploitation, sex predation, grooming and abuse, and pornography to ensure children’s safety online.

See full report here