Rethinking Platform Design and Accountability to Combat TFGBV in Africa

By Alice Aparo |

Africa’s rapid digitalisation, spanning e-commerce, online services, and digital infrastructure, has been accompanied by a persistent rise of Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV). African women and girls are exposed to several forms of TFGBV, including online harassment, algorithmic discrimination, and deepfakes that prevent equal participation in online spaces.

To commemorate this year’s International Women’s Day, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) convened a webinar themed Advancing platform accountability for women’s online safety in Africa to discuss efforts to enhance women’s online safety and hold digital platforms accountable.

A key insight from the discussion was that the rise of TFGBV in Africa is amplified by platform design, limited legal enforcement, weak moderation of content by digital platforms, and a poor system for reporting abuse and harmful content. The low levels of digital literacy, poor redress and appeals mechanisms, and lack of awareness among policymakers were also cited. Many of those who experience online abuse struggle to obtain justice and, in most cases, turn to self-censorship instead. This ultimately shrinks women’s voices in public discourse.

Further, online harm is often misframed as an individual responsibility, whereas it is largely enabled by platform design features such as anonymity and algorithm-driven content amplification that support harmful behaviour and accelerate the spread of harmful content. In her remarks, Barbra Okafor, founder and Lead Strategist at The Agency Lab, said major digital platforms prioritise “profit and scale over user safety”, adding that features like reposting and seamless sharing are built for viral amplification, not user protection.

Okafor added that when content that qualifies as harassment is posted, algorithms interpret the resulting engagement as “interest” and accelerate the distribution of the abuse rather than introducing safeguards. She described these platforms as “mini-gods” that have assumed regulatory power without corresponding accountability, making online user safety secondary to profit.

Gaps in content moderation, the limited inclusion of African linguistic expertise, and weaknesses in platform design and legal frameworks raise serious concerns about technology companies’ capacity to respond to harmful content in a timely and context-sensitive manner.

The increasing reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) for content moderation, yet it is largely trained on Western datasets, means it continues to struggle to detect harassment expressed in African languages or to interpret culturally specific slurs. This leaves women participating in public discourse exposed to unchecked, gendered insults and coordinated digital attacks.  

While AI-based features such as deepfake detection, content filters, and automated tools such as Safety Mode and Limits exist, their effectiveness is uneven across African contexts. These measures are further constrained by structural challenges, including limited investment in local content moderation and weak legal enforcement systems.

Marie-Simone Kadurira, an independent feminist researcher and panelist, noted that digital violence often mirrors and amplifies offline abuse, reinforcing patriarchal norms through technology. This perpetuates existing gender power imbalances and harmful social norms. She added that African women, particularly those in public-facing roles such as journalism, activism, or politics, face heightened, systemic harassment.

Despite the existence of cybersecurity and data protection laws in many African countries supported by regional instruments such as the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolutions on developing Guidelines to assist States monitor technology companies in respect of their duty to maintain information integrity through independent fact-checking (ACHPR/Res. 630 (LXXXII) 2025) and the Resolution on the protection of women against digital violence in Africa (ACHPR/Res. 522 (LXXII) 2022) – addressing TFGBV remains a persistent problem across the continent. The two resolutions emphasise the obligation of African states to protect individuals, particularly women and girls, from digital harms, including online harassment, cyberstalking, non-consensual sharing of intimate images, and other forms of abuse.

Dr. Abudu Sallam Waiswa, Head Litigation, Prosecution and Legal Advisory at the Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), said effective legal enforcement remains challenging because most major platforms, such as Meta, Google, and X, are neither based nor registered on the African continent. This creates significant jurisdictional gaps that hinder thorough investigations and accountability.

Several recommendations emerged at the discussion:

  1. Platforms must hire and train African local content moderators with linguistic and cultural expertise across African contexts.
  2. Governments must shift from reactive legislation to forward-looking, preventive frameworks. This includes mandating that platforms provide transparency on their algorithmic moderation and establishing a local physical presence to facilitate legal accountability.
  3. Civil society and policymakers need to deepen their understanding of how algorithmic systems work in order to effectively monitor and govern them.
  4. Fund women’s rights organisations to continue to provide survivor support, document abuse, advocate for policy reform, and hold both governments and tech companies accountable in the fight against TFGBV.
  5. Strengthen the ability of users to recognise, respond to, and recover from online harm.

CIPESA Urges Rights-Centred Approach to Uganda’s AI Strategy

By CIPESA Writer |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) has submitted recommendations to Uganda’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Emerging Technologies Strategy national taskforce, calling for a human rights-centred approach to the governance of these technologies.

The submission, made in response to the Ministry of ICT and National Guidance’s ongoing process to develop a National AI and Emerging Technologies Strategy, welcomes Uganda’s ambition to harness AI for development. At the same time, CIPESA cautions that innovation must be matched with the legal, institutional, and ethical safeguards needed to protect people from harms.

Discussions on Uganda’s AI policy come at a moment when AI technologies are already being deployed in both public and private sectors. The submission states that AI-enhanced tools are currently employed in customs risk profiling at the Uganda Revenue Authority, customer service functions, digital financial services, research organisations, and environmental monitoring initiatives.

In agriculture, AI-powered tools can support weather forecasting, pest detection, control and prevention, and tailored advice for farmers, whereas in healthcare, they can enhance disease detection, diagnostics, prescription and help address shortages in medical personnel. These applications highlight the transformative potential of AI, yet there are also concerns around surveillance, exclusion, discrimination, and misuse of personal data.

The submission is informed by CIPESA’s broader work on digital rights in Africa, including the Navigating the Implications of AI on Digital Democracy in Uganda report, which emphasises the growing impact of AI-driven technologies on online expression, political communication, surveillance practices, and civic participation.

The recommendations also build on CIPESA’s earlier work on developing an inclusive AI ecosystem for Uganda. According to the policy brief, An Artificial Intelligence Eco-System for Uganda, the country’s existing legal and policy frameworks provide a fragmented foundation for regulating AI and responding to emerging risks such as algorithmic bias, automated discrimination, opaque decision-making, and AI-enabled surveillance.

Accordingly, CIPESA calls for a rights-by-design approach to AI governance. High-risk AI systems used by both public and private actors should be transparent, auditable, and subject to independent oversight. It also calls for mandatory Human Rights Impact Assessments for AI systems used in sensitive sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, education, taxation, law enforcement, and social protection.

The submission further recommends dedicated legal and policy measures that address algorithmic transparency, automated decision-making, public-sector AI procurement, safeguards against discriminatory outcomes, and mechanisms for redress where harm occurs.

CIPESA also raises concerns about the growing use of automated systems in areas such as digital lending and mobile money services, where millions of Ugandans are already subjected to algorithmic profiling and automated credit scoring with limited transparency or accountability. The submission recommends that Uganda’s AI strategy should establish clear safeguards and oversight standards for both existing and future AI systems.

While AI presents significant opportunities for improving public service delivery and supporting development priorities, CIPESA stresses that such systems must be built using representative local datasets, and designed in ways that minimise bias, exclusion, and discriminatory outcomes.

The organisation further stresses that AI governance must be inclusive and participatory. The submission calls for meaningful involvement of civil society organisations, academia, technical experts, and affected communities in shaping Uganda’s AI strategy. It also recommends multilingual and accessible AI-enabled platforms that support citizen participation through channels that are accessible to underserved and low-literacy communities.

Beyond governance safeguards, CIPESA urges the government to invest in local AI research, innovation, and infrastructure development. It recommends support for universities, innovation hubs, and local startups, alongside the establishment of national AI research centres and dedicated funding mechanisms. Earlier recommendations by CIPESA also proposed the creation of a national AI Research Fund and citizen awareness programmes to improve public understanding of AI technologies and their societal implications.

Without deliberate investment in local capacity, Uganda risks becoming merely a supplier of raw data to foreign technology companies while deriving limited economic value from AI technologies. This would also deepen dependence on externally developed systems that may not fully reflect local contexts, needs, or priorities.

CIPESA additionally calls for alignment between Uganda’s strategy and broader regional initiatives, including the African Union Continental AI Strategy and wider African efforts on digital governance, data protection, and platform accountability.

Ultimately, CIPESA argues that Uganda’s AI and Emerging Technologies Strategy should put people first, ensuring that innovation and emerging technologies are matched with clear safeguards and meaningful oversight.

Read the full submission here: CIPESA Submissions on Uganda AI and Emerging Technology Strategy

CIPESA at the Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum 2026

By CIPESA Writer |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) is participating in this year’s Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum (DRIF), taking place in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire on April 14-16, 2026. Hosted by Paradigm Initiative under the theme, “Building Inclusive and Resilient Digital Futures”, the Forum focuses on strengthening technology to withstand crises and promoting digital rights across the Global South.

At DRIF, CIPESA is contributing to critical conversations that move beyond dialogue to impact. The organisation will host a session titled Beyond the Microphone – Turning IGF Participation into Policy Influence in West Africa,” exploring how engagement in global internet governance spaces can translate into meaningful policy change at national and regional levels.

CIPESA will also feature in the exhibition space, presenting the African Digital Reality Walk, “Paths, Traps, and Safe Passage.” This immersive experience invites participants to navigate the complexities of Africa’s digital landscape as it highlights the opportunities and the risks that define digital rights and freedoms today while encouraging digital resilience.

Where to Find CIPESA at DRIF

April 14

· Image-based TFBGV in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM |  Room 5
 Hosted by Digital Rights Alliance Africa (DRAA)

· Beyond the Microphone – Turning IGF Participation into Policy Influence in West Africa
  2:20 PM – 3:20 PM |  Room 6
 Hosted by CIPESA

· Reviewing the ACHPR Resolution 631 Draft Guidelines for Universal Access to Public Service Content in Africa
 2:20 PM – 3:20 PM | Room 4
 Hosted by SOS Coalition / UNESCO

April 15

· Shrinking Civic Space and Funding Cuts: How Can We Ensure Digital Resilience? 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM | Room 4
 Hosted by Oxfam

· Democracy Disconnected: Fighting Against Election Shutdowns in Africa
 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM | Room 5
 Hosted by Access Now

· Fighting Non-Consensual Intimate Image (NCII) Abuse in Africa & Beyond
 1:50 PM – 2:50 PM | Auditorium
 Hosted by Google

April 16

· From Data to Action: Responding to Digital Authoritarianism’s Threat to Civil Society
 11:10 AM – 12:10 PM | Room 3
 Hosted by EU-SEE

· Digital Sovereignty and Inclusive DPI in Africa: A Stakeholder Roundtable
 11:10 AM – 12:10 PM | Room 4
 Hosted by Digital Action

Assessing the Impact of the 2026 Internet Shutdown on Uganda’s Digital Economy

By Nadhifah Muhammad |

On January 13, 2026, two days prior to Uganda’s general election, the Uganda Communications Commission (UCC) ordered an internet shutdown purportedly to mitigate misinformation, electoral fraud and incitement of violence. This mirrored the two previous elections in the country, each of which had economic consequences due to the disruption of digital communications and services.

In the latest disruption, some essential services were exempted, such as healthcare systems, core banking platforms, immigration and aviation systems. However, key sectors of Uganda’s digital economy, íncluding ride-hailing and delivery systems, fintech services, e-Commerce, and digital health providers, were inaccessible. Data from the Cost of Internet Shutdown Tool (COST) estimates that Uganda lost Uganda Shillings (UGX) 59.7 billion (USD 16 million) during the almost five day internet shutdown. More was lost when social media and mobile money services remained constrained beyond the five days.

Notably, the severe direct economic losses and indirect impacts are likely to persist beyond the duration of the shutdown. During the shutdown, businesses dependent on digital platforms were unable to process transactions, communicate with customers, or coordinate logistics. Beyond the immediate financial losses suffered over the days the internet was off, the disruption unsettled supply chains, interrupted livelihoods, and raised concerns among investors about the reliability of Uganda’s digital infrastructure.

This brief examines the direct and indirect financial losses of the shutdown and highlights measures to various stakeholders need to safeguard a reliable digital economy as a key driver of Uganda’s digital transformation, these include;

  • Development and roll out comprehensive business continuity plans for the digital economy during elections and emergency situations.
  • Adoption of digital safety and security practices for detecting and mitigating risks and optimising systems to support business continuity amidst such disruptions. 
  • Advocacy for an enabling legal and policy environment for the digital economy.
  • Undertaking continuous capacity building for businesses in digital resilience.
  • Collaboration among stakeholders – business associations, civil society, academia and the legal fraternity in challenging shutdowns through strategic litigation.

Access the full brief here.

CIPESA Supports African Editors in Demands for Media Freedom, Information Integrity, and Data Access Rights

By Staff Writer |

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress 2026, held on February 23-24, 2026, assembled over 150 of Africa’s senior editors, newsroom leaders, and media executives from across the continent. The Congress sought to confront the various threats that contemporary journalism faces. A key theme emerging from deliberations was that in the age of artificial intelligence and the increasing concentration of power by platforms, journalism is more essential to democracy than it has ever been.

A communiqué emerging from the Congress articulated various arguments for reclaiming media value, rebuilding public trust, and redefining sustainable journalism in Africa’s increasingly digital landscape. The media is navigating an ever-changing information ecosystem where platform dominance, algorithmic opacity, media viability challenges, and the weaponisation of digital infrastructure itself have made the practice of independent journalism exponentially harder.

The Congress called for urgent structural reforms to safeguard information integrity and the sustainability of independent journalism in the face of platform dominance, fragile business models, and the rapid evolution of digital repression. These priorities align with the work of the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), which aims to promote the effective and inclusive use of ICT for improved governance and livelihoods in Africa.

During the Congress, CIPESA presented on the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolution 620: “Guidelines on Promoting and Harnessing Data Access for Advancing Human Rights in the Digital Age,” which establishes that journalists must have meaningful access to both public and platform-held data to conduct investigative reporting and hold power to account. The Congress’s communiqué reinforces this principle, recognising that data is indispensable for modern investigative journalism and democratic accountability.

Communiqué of the Inaugural Africa Editors Congress

Nairobi, Kenya | 5 March 2026

At a defining moment of profound transformation for journalism, democracy, and the global information ecosystem, editors and media leaders from across Africa convened in Nairobi for the inaugural Africa Editors Congress, organised by The African Editors Forum (TAEF) on February 23-24, 2026. Bringing together editorial leadership from diverse regions of Africa and the world, markets, and media traditions, the Congress marked a significant step toward building coordinated continental responses to the structural challenges reshaping journalism and public-interest information ecosystems.

Participants acknowledged that African journalism is confronting a convergence of pressures: platform dominance, rapid technological disruption, shifting audience behaviour, and fragile business models. Deliberations addressed both the economics and the practice of journalism, recognising that financial sustainability and editorial integrity are mutually reinforcing foundations of credible public-interest media. A central focus of the Congress was the growing impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism, and the urgent need to entrench ethical AI use in newsrooms while establishing fair and transparent compensation frameworks.

The Congress affirmed that independent journalism is an essential infrastructure for democratic and economic development. Markets, institutions, and public policy processes cannot function effectively without access to trusted information and data. The sustainability crisis confronting journalism, therefore, represents not only an industry challenge but a broader developmental risk for African economies and democratic processes.

Editors emphasised that rebuilding trust requires renewed commitment to strong professional practice alongside adaptation to a rapidly evolving information ecosystem. Participants recognised that public-interest content is increasingly produced beyond traditional newsroom structures, and that self-regulatory bodies should be broadened to include content creators committed to accountability, transparency, and accuracy while maintaining defined professional standards.

Participants expressed concern that existing copyright regimes were not designed for the large-scale extraction and use of journalistic content by generative AI systems. Discussions emphasised the need for rights-based approaches that secure equitable value for journalistic work, strengthen African agency within the global technology ecosystem, and address power imbalances between media organisations and dominant platforms. Competition-based remedies and coordinated regulatory approaches, such as the South African Competition Commission’s Media and Digital Platforms Market Inquiry report, were identified as important reference points for advancing sustainable outcomes in Africa.

Participants agreed that fragmented responses by individual African publishers or national markets are insufficient to address systemic challenges. Coalition-building and coordinated continental advocacy were identified as essential to shifting structural imbalances and ensuring that African perspectives shape global debates on media sustainability, technology governance, and information integrity. These include advancing normative frameworks such as the M20 Johannesburg Declaration and Resolutions 620, 630, and 631 of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), which carry direct implications for the path of African media within shifting technology ecosystems. Enhanced collaboration in policy-making processes is fundamental to building the African media’s agency in the global tech ecosystem and to strengthening public interest journalism on the continent. Delegates appreciate growing attention from the African Union (AU) on matters of media freedom, especially through the ACHPR, and propose more collaborative efforts between editors and the continental/regional and sub-regional mechanisms to promote media freedom and sustainability.

The Congress highlighted several areas of emerging consensus and ongoing work:

a)           Development of coordinated frameworks for collective engagement with global technology platforms, including approaches to fair compensation, bargaining power, and access to data.

b)          Advancement of public-interest-oriented regulatory frameworks aligned with digital realities and freedom of expression principles.

c)           Strengthening African editors’ societies as key institutional pillars for advocacy, coordination, and professional solidarity.

d)          Expansion of collaborative editorial strategies to improve coverage of emerging economic domains shaping Africa’s future, including technology and extractive sectors.

e)           Exploration of mechanisms to support small and community newsrooms through shared services, collaboration, and sustainable funding pathways.

f)            Continued dialogue on African-led funding approaches that reinforce editorial independence and long-term resilience.

Participants noted that existing continental mechanisms have not sufficiently prioritised coordinated responses to the structural challenges facing journalism. In this context, the Congress resolved that TAEF should be strengthened and properly resourced to serve as a central convening and coordinating platform capable of advancing shared priorities across the continent.

The Congress further resolved to:

i) Strengthen cross-border collaboration among African newsrooms and ethical public-interest content creators.

ii) Advance rights-based approaches to media regulation that protect freedom of expression and access to information while addressing harms within digital information environments.

iii) Promote high standards of journalistic practice that contribute to informed public discourse, accountable governance, and inclusive economic development.

iv) Facilitate evidence-based research, knowledge exchange, and capacity-building initiatives driven by African leadership.

v) Engage constructively with policymakers, regulators, civil society, and global partners to ensure African editorial perspectives inform governance debates shaping the future of information ecosystems.

vi) Journalism/media and communications training in colleges and universities should update and incorporate these resolutions into their professional training tool kit.

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress represents an important milestone toward building a unified, resilient, and forward-looking African public-interest media ecosystem grounded in collaboration, collective leadership, and shared responsibility for strengthening democratic and economic resilience across the continent.

Adopted in Nairobi, Kenya, on 24 February 2026

Endorsed by the following partners:

  • Media Leadership Think Tank, GIBS
  • Network of Independent Media Councils in Africa (NIMCA)
  • SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition
  • Wits Centre for Journalism, South Africa
  • Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)
  • M20

About The African Editors Forum (TAEF)

The Africa Editors Forum (TAEF) is a continental network of editors, senior newsroom leaders, and media executives committed to strengthening independent journalism and advancing media freedom across Africa. TAEF works to promote ethical standards, defend press freedom, deepen professional solidarity, and support editorial innovation in response to the evolving political, economic, and technological landscape shaping the continent. Through convenings such as the Africa Editors Congress and strategic partnerships with regional and global institutions, TAEF provides a platform for dialogue on journalism’s role in democracy, development, and African agency in emerging domains. The Forum also champions fair compensation for journalism as a public good, newsroom resilience in the digital age, and collaborative responses to threats facing journalists and media organisations. TAEF serves as a collective voice for Africa’s editors, advancing a journalism culture rooted in independence, public interest, and lasting excellence.