Strengthening Digital Rights Awareness and Practice in the Business Sector

By Nadhifah Muhammad |

It has been 12 months since the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) championed the Civil Society (CSO) Fund for digital rights in Uganda’s business sector. Across 12 districts, the supported initiatives have implemented action plans to advance advocacy and awareness on digital rights for businesses.

Radio and television programmes, social media campaigns, community forums, stakeholder dialogues, and caravans were part of the awareness campaigns conducted by partners. As a result, more than 17 million citizens, including district leaders, youths, and the general public, have been sensitised on business and digital rights. In parallel, CIPESA has supported Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in tourism and travel, education, digital marketing, IT development, legal services, lifestyle and health to conduct digital security self assessment and to integrate digital rights within their business models.

Before the interventions were rolled out, CIPESA built the partners’ capacity in implementing awareness raising and advocacy campaigns. At a March 2026 bootcamp, CIPESA re-convened the CSOs and SMEs, alongside innovators, researchers, local government officials and human rights advocates, to reflect on progress and take stock of their interventions. The 30 participants at the bootcamp also explored how to sustain, deepen, and institutionalise this work beyond the Advancing Respect for Human Rights by Businesses (ARBHR) project funded by the European Union and implemented with the support of Enabel.

A participant appreciated CIPESA’s approach to equipping them with skills and knowledge on digital rights and business and human rights ahead of rolling out the initiatives, stating: “It played a fundamental role in helping us appreciate the issues for us trickle them down to the communities.”

During the bootcamp, partners shared lessons and experiences from their action plans across the project focus regions: Busoga (Iganga, Mayuge, Bugiri, and Bugweri), the Albertine region (Hoima, Kikuube, Masindi, Buliisa, and Kiryandongo) and the Kampala Metropolitan area (Kampala, Mukono, and Wakiso).

Key lessons learnt included framing failure to respect digital rights as business risks to increase private sector engagement, prioritising multi-stakeholder engagements to foster ownership of initiatives, using local languages and simplified text while interfacing with grassroots communities, partnering with media to amplify awareness campaigns and consistent engagement with beneficiaries to ensure they grasp the context of the project initiatives.

However, despite the project’s wide reach, surveys conducted by project partners show that the majority of SMEs continue to face numerous digital vulnerabilities. For instance, a study by Girls for Climate Action on digital inclusion among 924 women-led green businesses in the Busoga region revealed an 85.9% digital skills gap. In Kampala, a mapping by Boundless Minds of 119 youth-led SMEs found that 49% were unaware of the existence of the Data Protection and Privacy Act, Cap 97 .

Similarly, the Capacity Needs Analysis conducted by the Private Sector Foundation Uganda (PSFU) on 79 Business Member Associations showed that while 72% of the businesses collect customer data, only 38% are aware of the Data Protection and Privacy Act, and only 16% have internal cybersecurity policies. These findings reinforce the need for continued support to help Ugandan businesses to understand and uphold digital rights in their operations.

However, the question of resources to continue the business and digital rights work beyond the ARBHR seed funding remained a concern. With the changing funding landscape, advocates were urged to rethink strategies for sustainability and reduce dependence on grants. As one participant noted, “Budget limitations greatly affected effective execution of some awareness campaigns,” which hampered the reach and depth of engagements.

Dr. Joyce Tamale, of Capital Solutions Ltd who facilitated a session on financial resilience, addressed this challenge by demonstrating how organisations can strengthen institutional sustainability and build long-term financing models to sustain their work. Framing the issue through a “mindset cycle,” she argued that resilience begins with a shift in thinking that shapes attitudes, actions, and ultimately results. She paired this with practical strategies such as building operating reserves, diversifying funding streams, and adopting long-term financial planning. Emphasising social entrepreneurship, she encouraged organisations to monetise their assets without compromising their mission.

To put this into practice, organisations were encouraged to codify financial health within their institutions through operating reserve policies, building emergency funds, and the use of financial instruments such as bonds and unit trusts, while also strengthening their own financial literacy.

To consolidate these gains and sustainability of efforts under the project, partners were rallied to mainstream digital rights and the Business and Human Rights agenda in their institutional programming.

African Governments are Using “Smart City” Systems to Monitor Dissent and Consolidate State Control

By CIVICUS |

CIVICUS discusses the spread of AI-powered surveillance in Africa with Wairagala Wakabi, executive director of the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) and co-editor of Smart City Surveillance in Africa: Mapping Chinese AI Surveillance Across 11 Countries, the latest report by the African Digital Rights Network (ADRN) and the Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
At least 11 African governments have spent over US$2 billion on Chinese-built surveillance infrastructure that uses AI-powered cameras, biometric data collection and facial recognition to monitor public spaces. Marketed as ‘smart city’ solutions to reduce crime and manage urban growth, these systems have been rolled out with little regulation and no independent evidence of their effectiveness. This technology is instead being used to monitor activists, track protesters and silence dissent, with a chilling effect on freedoms of assembly and expression.

How widespread is AI-powered surveillance in Africa?

Under the guise of reducing crime and fighting terrorism, at least 11 governments have invested over US$2 billion in AI-powered ‘smart city’ surveillance infrastructure: Algeria, Egypt, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Governments are installing thousands of CCTV cameras linked to central command centres, paired with tools such as automatic number-plate recognition, biometric ID systems and facial recognition to track people and vehicles. The largest known investments are in Nigeria (over US$470 million), Mauritius (US$456 million) and Kenya (US$219 million), though the real total is likely much higher, since surveillance spending is often secret and the report covers only 11 of Africa’s 55 countries.

Despite being presented as tools for crime prevention, counter-terrorism, modernisation and urban management, these are not targeted security measures. They represent a broader shift toward continuous, population-level monitoring of public spaces, rolled out over the past five to ten years almost always without clear legal limits or public debate.

Are these systems achieving their stated purpose?

No, there is no compelling evidence that they have in any of the countries studied. Instead, the data points to a pattern of use that raises serious human rights concerns.

In Uganda and Zimbabwe, AI-powered surveillance including facial recognition is being used to suppress dissent rather than ensure public safety. Activists, critics of the government, opposition leaders and protesters are identified and monitored through this system, even after protests have ended. In Mozambique, smart CCTV systems have reportedly been installed in areas of strong political opposition, suggesting targeted rather than neutral surveillance.

In Senegal and Zambia, countries with relatively low terrorism threats, governments have still invested heavily, which calls into question the stated security rationale.

Across the countries studied, the scale of surveillance far exceeds any actual or perceived security threat, and the infrastructure is consistently being used to monitor dissent and consolidate state control rather than address genuine public safety needs.

Who’s supplying this technology?

While firms from Israel, South Korea and the USA supply surveillance technologies, Chinese companies are the primary suppliers and financiers. They typically offer end-to-end ‘smart city’ packages that include cameras, software platforms, data analytics systems, training and ongoing technical support. Many projects are backed by loans from Chinese state-linked banks, which makes them financially accessible in the short term but creates long-term dependencies on external vendors for maintenance, system management and upgrades.

This model undermines transparency. Procurement processes are opaque and civil society, the public and oversight institutions including parliaments rarely have information about how these systems operate, how data is stored or who has access to it. That lack of accountability is what makes abuse not just possible, but hard to detect or challenge.

What impact is this having on civic space?

This large-scale surveillance of public spaces is not legal, necessary or proportionate to the legitimate aim of providing security. Recording, analysing and retaining facial images of people in public without their consent interferes with their right to privacy and, over time, their willingness to move, assemble and speak freely.

The most immediate consequence is a chilling effect, particularly where civic space is already restricted. Knowing they can be identified and tracked, activists and journalists are less willing to attend protests for fear of later arrest or reprisals, and end up self-censoring. Civil society organisations also report heightened anxiety about the risks for their members and partners.

What should governments and civil society do?

None of the 11 countries studied have a legal framework capable of balancing the state’s security needs with its commitments to protect fundamental human rights. That must change. Governments must adopt clear regulations on surveillance, including restrictions on facial recognition and other AI tools, require independent human rights impact assessments before introducing new systems, make procurement and deployment processes transparent and establish strong oversight mechanisms, including judicial and parliamentary scrutiny, to prevent abuse.

Civil society should continue documenting abuses, raising public awareness and advocating for accountability, while also supporting affected people and communities through digital security support and legal assistance.

Technology-exporting states and donors must enforce stricter controls and safeguards on the export and financing of these tools, support rights-based approaches to digital governance and help fund independent monitoring and advocacy across Africa.

Without urgent action, these systems will continue to expand, and the rights of people across Africa will continue to shrink.

CIVICUS interviews a wide range of civil society activists, experts and leaders to gather diverse perspectives on civil society action and current issues for publication on its CIVICUS Lens platform. The views expressed in interviews are the interviewees’ and do not necessarily reflect those of CIVICUS. Publication does not imply endorsement of interviewees or the organisations they represent.

This article was first published on the Website of CIVICUS LENS on April 07, 2026

African Commission Resolution 655 and What it Offers for the Future of Electoral Democracy

By Edrine Wanyama |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) welcomes the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) adoption of the Resolution on Elections in Africa in 2026 – ACHPR/Res. 655, which calls on all Member States to uphold human rights, the rule of law, and democratic governance.

The resolution comes at a time when several African countries are experiencing democratic regression, marked by harassment of opposition politicians and civil society actors, and mistrust in  electoral processes.  

With 12 countries – Algeria, Benin, Cape Verde, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Republic of the Congo, Sao Tome & Principe, and Zambia – scheduled to hold elections in 2026, the resolution provides a timely reminder to governments to ensure that elections are free, fair, and transparent, with the playing field levelled for all contestants.

Resolution 655 builds on existing regional instruments that seek to promote democratic governance on the continent. The main instrument is the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance , which has been  ratified by 39 out of 55 AU member states. Notably, some countries that are preparing to hold elections, including the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Republic of the Congo, are yet to ratify the Charter on Democracy, raising concerns about alignment with its standards.

The resolution also complements the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, whose article 9 calls for the inclusive participation of women in political and electoral processes.

Elections in the Digital Age
A notable strength of Resolution 655 is its recognition of the evolving digital landscape and its impact on electoral integrity. In line with Resolution ACHPR.Res. 580(LXXVIII)2024 on Internet Shutdowns and Elections in Africa, this new resolution re-echoes the need to respect internet freedoms, including freedom of expression and access to information, which are core to the conduct of free and democratic elections. Moreover, the resolution notes with concern, the human rights violations that were perpetuated in Tanzania and Cameroon, and the disruptions in Guinea-Bissau, during their elections in 2025.

The resolution also highlights emerging risks associated with the use of Artificial Intelligence, misinformation and disinformation, all of which can compromise  electoral integrity.

CIPESA stands in solidarity with the Commission’s call to end repression against voters, civil society, journalists, and opposition actors. We call upon all member states, particularly those holding elections in 2026, to implement the recommendations and ensure inclusive,  rights-respecting electoral processes.

CIPESA Announces Largest ADRF Grants – USD 320,000 to 18 Initiatives

By Ashnah Kalemera |

The Africa Digital Rights Fund (ADRF) has awarded USD 320,000 to 18 initiatives in 14 countries to support efforts to advance digital rights, inclusion, and online safety.

The grant recipients will promote responsible data governance, advance accessibility for persons with disabilities, counter Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV), and support digital equity for refugees. Others will build digital resilience among at-risk groups, deepen youth engagement in digital democracy, and promote women’s participation in the governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Based in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Rwanda, South Africa, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the awardees will tackle some of Africa’s most pressing digital challenges.

The latest awards under the 10th funding round bring to USD 1.3 million, the total amount the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) has disbursed under the ADRF. The fund was launched in 2019 to support organisations advancing digital rights in the face of limitations of reach, skills, resources and consistency in engagement.

“The overwhelming number of applications received in this round reflects the changing funding landscape for digital rights and democracy in Africa,” said Dr. Wairagala Wakabi, CIPESA’s Executive Director. “We are excited that the ADRF continues to bridge the prevailing funding gap and expand into new geographies and constituencies.”

The funding round received the largest number of applicants ever (430) and has expanded ADRF’s footprint into new countries such as Guinea, Liberia and Madagascar, and new beneficiary groups including youths, migrants, and a National Human Rights Institute (NHRI). The four most recent calls for proposals – Rounds eight, seven, six and five –  received 130, 280, 283 and 120 applications respectively.

Applications went through several rounds of reviews by two internal committees at CIPESA and an external committee of independent experts.

Overview of ADRF 10 Grantees

Digital Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities

The Rwanda-based Organisation d’Integration et de Promotion des Personnes Atteintes d’Albinisme (OIPPA) will build digital literacy and online safety skills for youth with disabilities, and conduct accessibility audits of government online platforms. In Ghana, Open Knowledge will enhance capacity and awareness of accessibility standards among civil society, parliamentary committees, and communications service providers.

Meanwhile, the Zimbabwe Council for the Blind will conduct accessibility audits of public sector websites, provide training in inclusive design, and advocate for implementation of inclusion and equity  under the country’s recently launched AI Strategy. The three initiatives will be anchored in CIPESA’s Disability and ICT Accessibility Framework Indicators.

The ADRF’s first NHRI grantee, the Ethiopia Human Rights Commission (EHRC), will strengthen staff capacity in digital inclusion and accessibility for persons with disabilities, and mainstream these principles into its broader human rights monitoring and oversight mandate.

Youth Engagement

Restless Development in Uganda will empower young media professionals and influencers to champion digital rights. Using its Youth Hack Methodology, the initiative will co-create innovative digital rights campaigns that combat disinformation and promote platform accountability.

AI Governance

As AI development and governance conversations continue to take root in Africa, women remain largely excluded. Women in Data Science and AI Zambia will build skills in ethical AI and algorithmic bias detection, and establish a national network to amplify women’s voices in Zambia’s AI policy conversations.

Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV)

Given the gaps in state actors’ understanding of digital harms and the need to equip them with practical tools and guidance, ALT Advisory will develop and pilot adjudication training materials for judicial officers in Kenya and South Africa. These materials will address online harms such as TFGBV, disinformation, and digital rights violations.

Research ICT Africa will examine the drivers of TFGBV in South Africa, identifying regulatory and AI ethics gaps. Findings will inform workshops and policy discussions aimed at strengthening national responses and safer digital environments.

In Zambia, Asikana Network will develop a safety toolkit with reporting guides, evidence collection tips and referral resources. This will be complemented by digital safety labs for women to build skills in managing online risks and responding to incidents.

In Madagascar, Communication Idea Development (CID) will counter gender-based disinformation and hate speech through digital literacy campaigns and workshops targeting organisations and activists working in Antananarivo, Boeny, and Vakinankarata.

Data Governance

Building on Liberia’s ongoing national data governance journey, including support from the African Union and CIPESA to develop a Data Governance Policy, the West Africa ICT Action Network (WAICTNet) will build awareness of data rights and support stakeholder readiness ahead of the launch of the Policy and the enactment of the Data Protection and Privacy Act (2024).

Similarly, Amnesty International Kenya’s Privacy First Team will engage Kenyan university students to understand data rights and promote transparent data governance in line with the Data Protection Act of 2019.

Technology and Migration

In Kenya, Haki Na Sheria will examine cross-border data collection and sharing under the Shirika Plan that promotes refugee inclusion and settlement, highlighting risks such as surveillance and exclusion. The project will focus on the Dabaab Complex – the world’s largest refugee camp – offering digital rights literacy sessions and producing data rights guides in Somali and Swahili.

In South Sudan, the Lim Nguen Foundation will build digital literacy and safety among refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in the Gorom and Juba camps. The project will establish “Digital First Responders” to support survivors of TFGBV, particularly women and girls.

Digital Resilience

Hexabelt, in partnership with Eleza Fact, a Congolese disinformation and fact-checking initiative, will strengthen the digital resilience of journalists in Kinshasa and Lumbubashi through hands-on training, newsroom security audits, and cybersecurity drills.

Across the border, the Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition (THRDC) will combine legal assistance, strategic litigation, and emergency support to safeguard environmental defenders and journalists from digital threats.

Information Integrity

In the aftermath of Guinea’s presidential election, tensions remain high ahead of the May 2026 legislative and municipal elections. Djikke Media will deliver workshops on fact-checking, open source investigations, digital hygiene, and deepfake detection.

In Uganda, a new knowledge agency – the House of Seshat – is being supported to explore how social media and generative AI are shaping political discourse and political accountability.

CIPESA at the Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum 2026

By CIPESA Writer |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) is participating in this year’s Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum (DRIF), taking place in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire on April 14-16, 2026. Hosted by Paradigm Initiative under the theme, “Building Inclusive and Resilient Digital Futures”, the Forum focuses on strengthening technology to withstand crises and promoting digital rights across the Global South.

At DRIF, CIPESA is contributing to critical conversations that move beyond dialogue to impact. The organisation will host a session titled Beyond the Microphone – Turning IGF Participation into Policy Influence in West Africa,” exploring how engagement in global internet governance spaces can translate into meaningful policy change at national and regional levels.

CIPESA will also feature in the exhibition space, presenting the African Digital Reality Walk, “Paths, Traps, and Safe Passage.” This immersive experience invites participants to navigate the complexities of Africa’s digital landscape as it highlights the opportunities and the risks that define digital rights and freedoms today while encouraging digital resilience.

Where to Find CIPESA at DRIF

April 14

· Image-based TFBGV in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM |  Room 5
 Hosted by Digital Rights Alliance Africa (DRAA)

· Beyond the Microphone – Turning IGF Participation into Policy Influence in West Africa
  2:20 PM – 3:20 PM |  Room 6
 Hosted by CIPESA

· Reviewing the ACHPR Resolution 631 Draft Guidelines for Universal Access to Public Service Content in Africa
 2:20 PM – 3:20 PM | Room 4
 Hosted by SOS Coalition / UNESCO

April 15

· Shrinking Civic Space and Funding Cuts: How Can We Ensure Digital Resilience? 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM | Room 4
 Hosted by Oxfam

· Democracy Disconnected: Fighting Against Election Shutdowns in Africa
 10:10 AM – 11:10 AM | Room 5
 Hosted by Access Now

· Fighting Non-Consensual Intimate Image (NCII) Abuse in Africa & Beyond
 1:50 PM – 2:50 PM | Auditorium
 Hosted by Google

April 16

· From Data to Action: Responding to Digital Authoritarianism’s Threat to Civil Society
 11:10 AM – 12:10 PM | Room 3
 Hosted by EU-SEE

· Digital Sovereignty and Inclusive DPI in Africa: A Stakeholder Roundtable
 11:10 AM – 12:10 PM | Room 4
 Hosted by Digital Action