CIPESA Submissions to White Paper on ICT Tax Reduction – Uganda

Policy Brief | 

The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector is not a standalone sector. Beyond broadcast and [tele]communications, it is increasingly integrating and digitalising critical parts of the economy, including manufacturing, finance, health, and transport. In Uganda, the ICT sector has been recognised as vital for enabling and boosting revenue generation and collection.

In this position statement, we showcase revenue-generation practices in Uganda’s ICT sector and benchmark them against East African jurisdictions, namely Kenya, Rwanda, and Tanzania, while occasionally drawing lessons from other markets.

By reviewing Uganda’s ICT sector tax policies, licensing fees, and regulatory regimes, this position statement demonstrates that although Uganda has registered considerable growth in the sector and made important steps toward revenue generation, the short-term gains have perhaps come at the expense of a more sustainable growth of the nascent digital economy.

In particular, the taxes on digital devices and connectivity infrastructure, combined with gaps in leveraging technology to support the domestic tax revenue mobilisation strategy, might be causing more harm than good. Although countries in the region face similar challenges – especially on the persistence of informality and tax complexities introduced by international technology data transfers and exchanges – Uganda’s ICT sector could learn from successes from elsewhere and undertake a comprehensive review of digital devices taxes and telecommunications license regimes, and also conduct tax impact assessments of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI).

We make a series of recommendations to the National Task Team on Enhancement of Government Revenue from the ICT Sector—Ministry of ICT in Uganda. We also stress that by carefully reviewing the country’s current ICT tax policies and drawing lessons from regional practices and tax frameworks, Uganda can substantially improve its capture of tax revenues from the digital economy. 

By facilitating wider access to devices such as smartphones as well as implementing a tax system based on significant economic presence and simplified tax collection mechanisms, Uganda could better harness the potential of its digital economy while ensuring that mobile network operators and digital platforms contribute fairly to the country’s total tax revenue. 

A key plank in this agenda should be a reduction in taxes on smartphones, tablets and entry-level laptops and a contemporaneous incentivisation regime to turn Uganda into a regional manufacturing hub for high-quality but affordable products in eastern and central Africa.

Find the full position paper here.

CIPESA Welcomes ACHPR Resolution on Monitoring Technology Companies

By Patricia Ainembabazi |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) welcomes the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolution on Developing Guidelines to Assist States Monitor Technology Companies in Respect of Their Duty to Maintain Information Integrity Through Independent Fact-Checking. Adopted on March 11, 2025, during its 82nd Ordinary Session, ACHPR/Res.630 (LXXXII) 2025 responds to growing concerns about the role of technology companies in undermining information integrity across Africa.

The Resolution mandates the ACHPR Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information to develop guidelines to assist States, civil society, and regulatory bodies in holding technology companies accountable. It marks a significant advancement in aligning digital governance practices with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and international human rights standards.

The ACHPR Resolution comes on the heels of worrying trends with regards to platform accountability and content moderation in Africa. These include social media threatening social cohesion and elections integrity, a reduction of human fact-checkers, overreliance on automated systems, and insufficient coverage of African languages. While the use of platforms is governed by standards and policies, the Commission cautions that they are not substitutes for corporate responsibility or independent fact-checking mechanisms. The Resolution calls for neutrality to overcome the weaponisation of certain social networks, particularly during elections and conflict situations.

Key Highlights of Resolution 630

Affirmation of Human Rights Standards: The Resolution reaffirms Articles 2 and 9 of the African Charter, emphasising the right to freedom of expression and access to information both offline and online. It also aligns with Principle 5 of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa, which calls for equivalent online protections.

Call for Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIAs): Digital companies operating in Africa are urged to conduct transparent HRIAs, particularly when contemplating policy changes or during high-risk events such as elections and public health crises, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Demand for Data Transparency: The ACHPR stresses that African researchers, regulators, and civil society should have equitable access to platform data to facilitate independent assessments of systemic risks to information integrity.

Development of Monitoring Guidelines: The Resolution instructs the Special Rapporteur to collaborate with civil society, regulators, and technology companies to create Guidelines that enable effective monitoring of platforms, including assessing the role and effectiveness of independent fact-checking initiatives.

Initial Recommendations from CIPESA

CIPESA views Resolution 630 as a timely intervention for platform accountability and a significant opportunity to strengthen digital rights in Africa. To ensure the effective implementation of ACHPR Resolution 630, we recommend:

  • A multi-pronged approach that begins with active engagement by civil society organisations to facilitate meaningful participation in the Special Rapporteur’s consultations to shape practical, contextually grounded, and enforceable Guidelines that reflect African realities and priorities.
  • Policy advocacy for national adaptation, encouraging African States to formally integrate the forthcoming Guidelines into their national digital governance laws and regulations, thereby ensuring their applicability and enforcement beyond soft commitments.
  • Support for the creation and sustenance of independent monitoring initiatives by the private sector and other players, including civil society-led observatories that can track, assess, and publicly report on the performance of technology companies in adhering to the Guidelines, thus fostering greater transparency, accountability, and respect for digital rights throughout the continent.

The adoption of ACHPR Resolution 630 signals a critical shift toward building an African digital ecosystem rooted in human rights, transparency, and accountability. The forthcoming Guidelines, if well-designed and widely adopted, could set a new global benchmark for regulating technology companies’ role in safeguarding information integrity.

CIPESA remains committed to contributing to this process and advancing an open, inclusive, and rights-respecting internet in Africa.

CIPESA Joins Six Civil Society Organisations in Landmark Case Challenging Internet Shutdowns in Kenya

Press Release |

Nairobi, Kenya – In a significant step toward safeguarding digital rights and constitutional freedoms, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) and six other organisations have filed a landmark public interest case before the High Court of Kenya to challenge the arbitrary and unlawful disruptions of internet access in the country.

The petitioners – Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE), Katiba Institute, Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ), Law Society of Kenya (LSK), Paradigm Initiative (PIN), the International Commission of Jurists – Kenya Section (ICJ Kenya), and CIPESA, seek judicial redress following recurring internet disruptions during critical national moments, including the 2024 #RejectFinanceBill protests and the 2024 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) examinations.

Following the filing of the case, High Court Justice Bahati Mwamuye issued interim orders prohibiting any interference with internet access until the case is heard and determined. The legal challenge targets the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA), the Attorney General, the Cabinet Secretary for Information, Communications and the Digital Economy, and service providers Safaricom and Airtel Kenya.

The petition relies on technical evidence from Cloudflare, the Open Observatory of Network Interference (OONI), and the Internet Outage Detection and Analysis (IODA), which confirms instances of intentional internet throttling and platform blocking, such as the disruption of Telegram.

“These unlawful internet shutdowns directly violate rights enshrined in the Kenyan Constitution, including freedom of expression (Article 33), media freedom (Article 34), access to information (Article 35), and economic and social rights (Article 43),” said Eric Mukoya, Executive Director of ICJ Kenya.

Speaking on behalf of CIPESA, Patricia Ainembabazi, Policy and Advocacy Officer, stated:

“This is a trend-setting moment for Kenya as a country to uphold the rule of law and adhere to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights Resolution 580, which speaks directly to freedoms of expression and deters internet shutdowns. With the recent positive ECOWAS Court judgments in Guinea, Togo and Nigeria, we hope that East Africa will do better.”

The case marks a pivotal moment in the defence of the digital civic space in Kenya. The petitioners argue that any restriction to internet access must be subject to strict legal scrutiny under Article 24 of the Constitution, which requires any limitation to be lawful, necessary, and proportionate.

“The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for millions of Kenyans who rely on unimpeded connectivity for livelihoods, education, and civic engagement,” said Kennedy Kachwanya, Chairperson of BAKE. “We call upon civil society, media partners, and the international community to amplify this crucial fight for digital rights as a cornerstone of Kenya’s democratic future.”

This collective legal action is part of a growing continental movement to resist digital repression and promote rights-respecting governance in Africa’s digital age.

Signed,

1. Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE)

2. Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)

3. Katiba Institute

4. Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ)

5. Law Society of Kenya (LSK)

6. Paradigm Initiative (PIN)

7. The International Commission of Jurists, Kenya Section (ICJ Kenya)

Resources:

Petition by ICJ Kenya, BAKE & others against CA, AG & others on Internet Shutdowns in Kenya is here.

Internet Shutdown Case Court Orders, Download PDF here.

Consultations Launched for African Guidelines on Ensuring Information Integrity on Tech Platforms

DRIF 2025 |

Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) and UNESCO have officially launched regional consultations to develop the African guidelines for monitoring technology companies’ roles in ensuring information integrity on their platforms. This initiative stems from the adoption of the resolution on developing Guidelines to assist States monitor technology companies in respect of their duty to maintain information integrity through independent fact checking – ACHPR/Res.630 (LXXXII) 2025 by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR). The launch featured a high-level panel discussion held at the Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum (DRIF) 2025, an annual multi-stakeholder convening hosted by Paradigm Initiative (PIN), which this year was held at the Mulungushi International Conference Centre in Lusaka, Zambia. 

Resolution 630, adopted at the ACHPR 82nd Ordinary Session held in March 2025, mandates the development of Africa-centered, rights-respecting guidelines that would hold digital platforms accountable for the role that they play in the spread of misinformation, disinformation, hate speech, and other online harms.

Following the launch, MMA will lead a multi-stakeholder consultative process across various African countries to ensure the development of guidelines that are inclusive and reflect the continent’s unique online contexts. The resolution specifically notes concerns about recent regressions by technology companies concerning information integrity, the need for content moderation systems that fully cover African languages, adequate Artificial Intelligence (AI) training for these languages, and comprehensive African access to platform data for independent risk assessments. “Africa must not be a passive recipient of global governance frameworks.

These consultations offer us an opportunity to develop robust, localized standards that reflect our unique policy realities and amplify the voices of our people,” said Prof. Guy Berger, former UNESCO Senior Director and media policy expert.

These consultations aim to position and consolidate Africa’s role in shaping its digital future, moving beyond passive recipients of global governance frameworks. They provide an opportunity for meaningful localization of global principles in ways that resonates with African policy needs. 

“This is a pivotal moment for the African tech policy arena especially as it navigates a digital ecosystem marked by linguistic and cultural diversity, low internet penetration, low digital literacy, and varying levels of regulatory maturity. We commend the Commission’s efforts to safeguard online expression, promote information integrity, and uphold the accountability of tech companies operating across the continent and look forward to broad-based consultations that are transparent, participatory, and anchored in human rights standards,” said Juliet Nanfuka, Research and Communications Officer at the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA).

The process will focus on how best to monitor and hold big tech accountable while safeguarding democratic discourse, promoting freedom of expression, digital rights, and human dignity as enshrined in the African Charter and related declarations. “This is not just about monitoring platforms but about safeguarding democratic discourse and ensuring African citizens have a voice in shaping our digital future,” said Noor Ahmad, Communications Manager at MMA.

The ACHPR Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa Commissioner Hon. Ourveena Geereesha Topsy-Sonoo, who is mandated to develop these guidelines in collaboration with other stakeholders, participated in consultation on the resolution at the Global World Press Freedom Day Conference on 06 May 2025 in Brussels, Belgium. Consultations have commenced through a public forum (available here) and will continue till November 2025.

 “This resolution 630 is a landmark step towards developing an Africa-led framework for digital platforms accountability and reminds us that everyone, everywhere, in Africa, deserves access to trustworthy and reliable information online. We are glad that this resolution calls on all digital platforms – not just traditional media – to put the public interest first, listen to diverse voices, and protect fundamental human rights so that digital spaces truly serve and empower people in the digital age. Through these regional consultations, we are laying the foundation for a participatory and rights-based approach to platform governance which reflects the realities and languages of the diverse communities in Africa.” said John Okande, Programme Officer, UNESCO.

MMA will conduct similar engagements at other upcoming continental conferences, with final guidelines presented to the African Commission in 2026 for an official launch at the Global World Press Freedom Day Celebrations in 2026. 

This article was first posted on the UNESCO website.

Press Freedom at the Crossroads of AI and Democracy

By Juliet Nanfuka |

World Press Freedom Day (WPFD) traces its origins to the landmark Windhoek Declaration in 1991, which called for a free, independent, and pluralistic press as essential to democracy and development and was adopted by UNESCO in 1993. Since then, the media landscape has evolved drastically, shifting from print and broadcast to include various digital media platforms. This new age of journalism has come with complex challenges including privacy violations, disinformation, and algorithmic control.

The theme of this year’s WPFD “Reporting in the brave new world – The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on press freedom and the media” – is a fitting one especially as across the world,  developments in technology are having an impact not only in how users engage online but also how journalists navigate news production (See example of Nigeria station launching AI news anchors) and distribution. According to UNESCO, “AI is transforming journalism, providing tools that enhance investigative reporting, content creation, and fact-checking. It allows for greater efficiency, multilingual accessibility, and improved data analysis. However, these advancements also bring risks: AI-generated misinformation and disinformation, deepfake technology, biased content moderation, and surveillance threats to journalists.”

Indeed, these risks are contributing to a downward trend in press freedom. For the first time since its inception in 2002, the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) World Press Freedom Index has ranked the global state of press freedom as a “difficult situation”. According to RSF, in over half of the world’s population, press freedom is entirely absent and practicing journalism is particularly dangerous. In many African countries, these challenges are compounded by internet disruptions, low literacy levels, and a persisting digital divide – one likely to be widened by AI.

An inaugural study into journalists safety in Africa by the Collaboration in International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) noted an increase in attacks against journalists, digital media and independent content creators by state and non-state actors through legal and extra-legal measures. With the popularity of and reliance on digital media, governments have been keen on monitoring and regulating online spaces and surveilling journalists thus undermining their privacy and safety.

See: The State of Media Freedom and Safety of Journalists in Africa Report

CIPESA has worked to address the challenges of journalist safety including through research into the pathways and effects of disinformation, campaigns such as  #WeekOfSafety which complemented multi-stakeholder dialogues promoting journalist safety and digital resilience in an age of disinformation and AI. With support from the Africa Digital Rights Fund (ADRF), CIPESA has also bridged funding gaps for media safety and integrity initiatives and supported research and training aimed at countering digital threats. At the Uganda national commemoration of WPFD hosted by the Uganda Media Sector Working Group (UMSWG) this year,  CIPESA will host a digital security clinic and workshop on misinformation and disinformation.

At the recently concluded Digital Rights and Inclusion Forum (DRIF) hosted by Paradigm Initiative, CIPESA participated in a high-level panel hosted by Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) and UNESCO which served as the launch of consultations on the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)  Resolution on developing Guidelines to assist States monitor technology companies in respect of their duty to maintain information integrity through independent fact checking – ACHPR/Res.630 (LXXXII) 2025. Adopted by the ACHPR meeting at its 82nd Ordinary Session in March 2025, the resolution notes the “regress by technology companies with regard to information integrity and online protection of expression and access to information”. The Commission calls upon the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa to develop guidelines that can enable States Parties to effectively monitor platforms’ performance in order to inform efforts to advance information integrity online, including the role of independent fact-checking in the African context.

Indeed, at a time when civic space is shrinking while press freedom and access to information are facing even greater challenges, it is only fitting that that the annual Forum on Internet Freedom in Africa (FIFAfrica) hosted by CIPESA heads to Windhoek, Namibia to provide a platform to take stock of the various shifts in the technology landscape that have come to inform the media landscape and to tap into the opportunities that can help shape the internet we want such as through contributing to the development of the afore mentioned guidelines.  

See: Forum on Internet Freedom in Africa 2025 

The legacy of the 1991 Windhoek Declaration will carry into FIFAfrica25 as the role of technology in enabling the realisation of democracy and development will be the cornerstone of many discussions especially the role it plays in building inclusive, participatory, and democratic societies in the face of AI.