Claiming Digital Rights in Uganda’s Business Sector

By CIPESA Writer |

In an era where digital technologies are reshaping every sector including health, agriculture, finance, education and the labour market, Uganda is fast-tracking its ambition to become a fully connected, inclusive digital society. Yet, as the country rolls out its Digital Transformation Roadmap, critical questions remain: Who is being left behind? Who bears the cost of connecting the unconnected? How do we ensure that technological innovation does not come at the expense of human rights protection?

These were the central concerns at the inaugural National Business and Digital Rights Policy Dialogue hosted by the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) on July 23, 2025. The event brought together 55 participants comprising policymakers, innovators, civil society, the private sector, and development partners to explore how Uganda’s digital transformation is affecting human rights, especially data protection, privacy, access, and equity. The dialogue reviewed not just Uganda’s      progress, but the power dynamics, policy gaps, and human rights risks shaping digitalisation in business.

The Digital Vision vs. The Digital Reality

Uganda’s Digital Transformation Roadmap sets bold targets: 90% household connectivity, nationwide broadband coverage, and widespread e-service access by 2040. Progress is visible, with over 4,000km of national optical fibre infrastructure laid, and more than 100 digital public services rolled out. Yet, beneath these achievements, gaps in digital literacy, access and utility, as well as funding constraints, persist.

According to the 2024 National Population and Housing Census, Uganda’s population stands at 45.9 million, of whom 50.5% are under the age of 18, representing a massive youth cohort born into a digital world yet often lacking affordable internet access and digital tools. Connectivity gaps are further shaped by geography, with over 75% of the population living in rural areas where infrastructure is limited.

On the gender lens, women who comprise 23.4 million of the population, slightly outnumbering men at 22.5 million, continue to disproportionately face digital access barriers. These range from high data costs, low digital literacy, and limited access to devices and digital infrastructure, especially in rural and remote districts. As one of the panelists during the policy dialogue noted, “Digital transformation is moving fast, but our institutions and communities are not always keeping pace.”

Meanwhile, the informal sector, which employs approximately 80-92% of the country’s workforce, remains largely invisible in national digital strategies and compliance frameworks. This informal sector significantly overlaps with Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), which are central to Uganda’s economic growth, yet they often operate without proper tools to secure user data or navigate the evolving digital compliance landscape due to limited awareness, resources, and technical capacity.

As businesses digitise, their responsibility to protect users’ rights increases. However, many of them lack the knowledge to protect these rights. Uganda’s laws and enforcement mechanisms also have gaps. As a result, there is weak oversight over fintech platforms and digital lenders, low awareness and implementation of the Data Protection and Privacy Act, rampant digital surveillance, and gendered digital harms, including online harassment.

Data Is Power but Who Holds It?

Uganda’s fast-growing population is generating an unprecedented amount of personal data. The 2024 population census itself relied on tablet-based digital enumeration for the first time. However, while digital data collection is expanding, data governance is not keeping pace. The Personal Data Protection Office (PDPO) and National Information Technology Authority Uganda (NITA-U) are key players, but capacity and resourcing gaps persist. If left unaddressed, digital innovation risks entrenching inequality, with vulnerable populations, especially refugees, informal workers, and low-income women, paying the price for systems that were not designed with their rights in mind.      

Digital Rights are Human Rights

The future of work in the advent of technology emerged as a key aspect of digital rights, with Moses Okello of the National Organisation of Trade Unions (NOTU) warning that Uganda’s labour laws have not kept pace with the rise of gig work and digital employment. Millions of informal workers remain unprotected and unaware of their rights in the digital economy. He called for urgent legal reforms and a national strategy that integrates labour protections into digital policy, while urging stronger collaboration with civil society to build grassroots awareness and empower workers to navigate digital transitions.

Ruth Ssekindi, Director at the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), underscored the commission’s constitutional duty to uphold human rights across both state and private sectors, particularly in Uganda’s fast-evolving digital landscape. She highlighted growing concerns over digital rights violations including uninformed data consent, artificial intelligence (AI) manipulation, child exploitation, and poor data security, noting that these challenges disproportionately affect vulnerable populations amid low digital literacy and weak enforcement.

Ssekindi called on businesses to embrace a broader duty of care that goes beyond tax compliance and profit, stressing the need to respect, protect, and remedy digital rights violations. She also pointed to the persistent gender gap in digital access and urged greater inclusion of women and marginalised communities in digital development. While the UHRC plays a key role in shaping digital governance through legal review, education, and policy oversight, she noted that the commission must be adequately resourced, empowered and supported to effectively fulfil its mandate in the digital age.

The dialogue reinforced a clear message that connectivity alone is not enough. Uganda must build an inclusive digital economy anchored in justice, transparency, and community voice. This means empowering watchdog institutions like the PDPO, updating outdated laws and regulations, investing in digital literacy, especially for youths and women, and supporting civic participation in digital policy-making.

In direct response, CIPESA launched the #BeeraSharp (translated as “Be Smart”) campaign. This initiative aims to equip Ugandan businesses with the knowledge and tools to act responsibly in the digital space. #BeeraSharp champions a culture of accountability, urging businesses to take charge of how they collect, store, share, and protect user data. It also promotes understanding of legal obligations under Uganda’s Data Protection and Privacy Act, while encouraging ethical digital conduct across sectors.

A Digital Future for All?

As Uganda ramps up its digitalisation agenda and embraces emerging technologies such as AI and robotics, businesses, policymakers, and civil society must work hand in hand to ensure Uganda’s digital revolution is not just a story of innovation but also a story of inclusion and respect for human rights. As the dialogue closed, one key takeaway stood out: Uganda’s digital future must be intentionally inclusive and rights-driven. Achieving this will require cross-sector collaboration to scale digital skills, reform of outdated laws, more financial and capacity support to institutions like UHRC, NITA-U and the PDPO to protect data rights, and empowering communities through digital literacy, local innovation, and inclusive governance.

CIPESA Submits Report on the State of Digital Rights in Liberia to the Universal Periodic Review

By Edrine Wanyama |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) and the West Africa ICT Action Network (WAICTANET) have submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council a report that shines a light on Liberia’s human rights record in the digital domain. The report documents developments in Liberia’s digital civic space and offers key information to countries and other stakeholders involved in scrutinising Liberia’s performance under the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism.

The UPR process offers all United Nations (UN) member states the opportunity to declare what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situation in their countries and to fulfil their human rights obligations. The report notes that while Liberia has taken some steps to promote the realisation of digital rights, it maintains regressive laws, such as the 1978 Penal Code, and there have been instances of curtailment of rights.

According to Patricia Ainembabazi, Policy and Advocacy Officer at CIPESA, this report is essential for tracking the progress made by Liberia in protecting and promoting human rights in online spaces in accordance with domestic, regional and international obligations. She added: “The report forms the basis for identifying opportunities and shaping the human rights situation to enable the realisation of civil liberties in online spaces. Liberia should take these observations seriously and undertake the necessary reforms.”

The report notes that since Liberia was last reviewed in 2020, it has made some progressive steps towards recognising the importance of online spaces and enacted the Kamara Abdullah Kamara Act on Press Freedom which, among others, decriminalises defamation. It has also taken strides to enhance child protection online and to promote gender equality.

Nevertheless, evidence over the years shows a clear onslaught on the digital civic space, with targeted actions against journalists, human rights defenders (HRDs) and activists. These actors often face intimidation and threats, arrests, detention and lengthy prison sentences that are often enabled by laws that are overly broad and ambiguous. In other cases, there have been violent attacks and unresolved deaths of journalists under suspicious situations including assault. These actions have cast a chill on freedom of expression and led to self-censorship by journalists and HRDs and online activists.

Liberia does not have a specific law on data protection, although a validation of the draft law was conducted in late 2024. Since Liberia does not have a data protection authority, individuals’ data remains vulnerable to misuse by unscrupulous individuals, yet there are limited avenues for legal redress for aggrieved parties.

Furthermore, data protection standards in the country fall short of regional and international data protection standards such as those prescribed by the African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection – which Liberia is yet to ratify.

Meanwhile, Liberia continues to grapple with high levels of digital exclusion due to poverty, digital illiteracy and the concentration of digital access in urban centres.

The report calls upon the Liberian government to:

  1. Repeal all restrictive laws and provisions that criminalise speech and undermine freedom of expression, including section 11.11 of the Penal Law, which penalises individuals for publicly accusing the President of misconduct, even if the accusation is true; section 11.12 on sedition that broadly criminalises acts deemed as incitement against the government; and section 11.14 on criminal malevolence that targets statements which could harm the reputation of public officials. These provisions deter investigative journalism and public accountability.
  2. Expedite the enactment of a specific law on data protection to safeguard and protect personal data. Additionally, ratify and domesticate the Malabo Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection to show commitment to cyber security and personal data protection.
  3. Amend the Freedom of Information Act to strengthen enforcement and ensure greater accessibility to public information. The law should include clear, enforceable penalties for public officials who unjustifiably deny access to information, and establish mechanisms for timely, proactive disclosure by government bodies.
  4. Codify legal safeguards for internet freedom by explicitly protecting online expression within the provisions of the Telecommunications Act 2007, and fast-track the enactment of the Cybercrime Act.
  5. Empower the Independent National Commission on Human Rights (INCHR), by among others, increasing human and financial resources to enhance and facilitate its role in promoting and protecting human rights.
  6. Enhance the capacity of judicial officers and law enforcement officers on online freedoms.
  7. Implement strict protocols preventing the arbitrary arrest or harassment of journalists for their work, and train security forces in this regard.
  8. Comprehensively investigate and prosecute all cases of abuse and killing of journalists to ensure that justice is served.
  9. Enact a specific law on the protection of children’s privacy, protection against online violence, exploitation, sex predation, grooming and abuse, and pornography to ensure children’s safety online.

See full report here

Ayele Addis Ambelu

Ayele Addis Ambelu is an award-winning journalist, investigative reporter, and digital rights advocate with over five years of experience in public interest journalism. He works with Africa News Channel and Ethiopian Mass Media Action (EMMA NEWS), producing in-depth stories on digital
governance, human rights, technology, and environmental justice. Ayele’s reporting focuses on the impact of digital public infrastructure—such as digital ID systems, open data, and internet access—on marginalized communities in Ethiopia and across Africa. He holds an MA in Media and
Communication and has published over 100 investigative pieces spanning radio, online, and academic platforms. As a media literacy trainer and program editor, Ayele also mentors emerging journalists on fact-checking, digital safety, and AI in the newsroom. His work has been recognised by the Nile Media Awards, the Festove investigative Media Award in Switzerland, the African Continental Re media award in South Africa, and WHO Africa. He is passionate about using journalism to expose inequality and drive inclusive digital transformation.

Below articles published include,

Digital Ethiopia or Digital Mirage? Who Pays When E-Government Fails

Behind Fayda: The Hidden Costs, Winners, and Losers of Ethiopia’s Digital ID Revolution

What is the digital ID that is supposed to be issued to all legal residents of Ethiopia?

Challenges and solutions of the Digital Ethiopia 2025 journey

Digital Ethiopia or Digital Mirage? Who Pays When E-Government Fails

Digital Ethiopia 2030: A Bold National Vision at the Crossroads of Promise and Peril

800 types of government services converted to digital

Audio Recordings

By Ayele Addis Ambelu

Making AI More Participatory and Inclusive for the Benefit of All Africans

Joint Statement |

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping our societies; we must ensure ethical, inclusive, and rights-based approaches rooted in the lived realities of our communities, guide its development and application in Africa. 

The Global AI Summit on Africa 2025 held in April in Kigali is one of the important movements and platforms, bringing together civil society organizations, african leaders, parliamentarians, youth actors, researchers, and private sector leaders, to champion principles that uphold human dignity, safeguard marginalized voices, and foster responsible innovation. We applaud the inspiring conversations around AI’s transformative potential for the continent, driven at the Summit. However, such a conversation should not end there. To move from inspiration to impact, we must recognize that some critical voices need to be involved in decision-making spaces.

In collaboration with Niyel, Mozilla, Pollicy, ACM Nigeria, Innovation for Policy Foundation, MISA, and the Namibia University, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) contributed to the development of this call, addressed to african leaders, organisers, and co-chairs of the Global AI Summit 2025 to emphasise the need for more inclusive and participatory approaches.

Through this statement, we are calling for clear commitments and tangible actions around three priorities:

  • Decent AI Jobs for Africa’s people
  • Meaningful public participation in AI governance
  • Resources and support for inclusive, participatory AI development

We invite you to join the call for action and become a signatory to a collective statement that pushes for global collaboration, transparency, and oversight in AI governance. Your voice matters in shaping a future where AI serves humanity, not the other way around. 25 signatories are on board. Whether you’re advocating for gender justice, digital inclusion, or ethical tech, this is your moment to co-create solutions that reflect shared values and lived realities.

Sign the call. Share it widely. Mobilize your networks. Together, we can build an AI ecosystem rooted in equity, accountability, and collective knowledge.

To sign the statement, fill out this form and click here to download the statement.

Naima Arabow

Naima Arabow is a Mogadishu based journalist with over seven years of professional experience in reporting and documentary production. Her work focuses on humanitarian issues, particularly those affecting marginalised and vulnerable communities in conflict-affected areas. Naima has produced in-depth stories that shed light on topics such as displacement, gender inequality, access to healthcare and education, and the impact of insecurity on civilians. She has worked with local and international media outlets, and collaborated with civil society actors to document stories that drive awareness and change. Through compelling storytelling, she not only informs but also inspires dialogue, empathy, and action especially in fragile contexts like Somalia.