Promoting Effective and Inclusive ICT Policy in Africa

Tag Archives: Social Media

  HomeCollaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)  /  Social Media
29Dec

Dianah Msipa

Author CIPESA Posted on

Who is Dianah Msipa?

I am an International Human Rights Lawyer specialising in Disability Rights Law and Policy in Africa. I am currently the Programme Manager of the Disability Rights Unit at the Centre for Human Rights in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria, where I contribute to promoting the rights of persons with disabilities in Africa through human rights education, advocacy, capacity strengthening, and research. I am also a postdoctoral fellow at the same institution, conducting research on the sexual and reproductive rights of women with disabilities in Africa. I am an author with numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals and books, and I serve as an Assistant Editor for the academic journal, the African Disability Rights Yearbook. I am also an educator teaching African disability rights protection at the post-graduate level at the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria.

I first became interested in disability rights while working as a Criminal Prosecutor. One of the cases I was prosecuting involved a young woman with intellectual disability who had been raped. I found it difficult to lead evidence from this complainant because I had no knowledge about how to provide accommodations to persons with disabilities in the criminal justice system. That is what motivated me to learn more about the rights of persons with disabilities. I then pursued a Master’s degree at McGill University in Canada, where I conducted research on the barriers that prevent persons with disabilities from accessing justice on an equal basis with others and the various accommodations that can be provided to enable their effective participation. After completing my Master’s degree, I left prosecution and began working in the disability rights sector, first as a human rights researcher with Inclusion International, and then as a programme officer and subsequently a programme manager in the Disability Rights Unit at the Centre for Human Rights. I further specialised in Disability Rights in Africa through my Doctor of Laws degree, which I completed at the Centre for Human Rights. Although access to justice was my entry point into disability rights, I later became interested in other areas of disability rights, including digital rights. Digital inclusion is not simply a right in and of itself, but it is also necessary for the enjoyment of numerous other rights, including education and access to justice. It is therefore integral for the societal inclusion of persons with disabilities and an important aspect of the work that I do.

A sign of progress in the recognition of digital rights for persons with disabilities is the increased attention being paid to inclusive digital technologies in recent years, particularly at the regional level in law and policy. The inclusion of digital rights in the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Africa (African Disability Protocol) is indicative of progress towards the digital inclusion of persons with disabilities on the continent. Article 15 on accessibility and Article 24 on access to information are examples of rights that require the digital inclusion of persons with disabilities. By incorporating digital rights into the African Disability Protocol, the African Union has effectively established an enabling legal framework for promoting the digital rights of persons with disabilities. In conjunction with policy frameworks such as the Economic Commission for West Africa (ECOWAS) ICT Accessibility Policy, the African Disability Protocol emphasises the importance of digital inclusion for persons with disabilities.

Poverty remains a pressing challenge to the realisation of digital rights by persons with disabilities in Africa. Research indicates that persons with disabilities are disproportionately represented amongst the poor due to a lack of opportunities to access education and employment. Financial barriers make it difficult for persons with disabilities to have access to smart devices, internet connectivity and digital skills training. This is a significant barrier to their digital inclusion on the continent. Moreover, the rapid pace at which technology, including Artificial Intelligence, is developing without much attention being paid to its impact on the rights of persons with disabilities, creates an additional threat that needs to be addressed.

To address some of these challenges, States and other relevant stakeholders need to ensure that persons with disabilities receive digital skills training and are provided with accessible devices to participate in the digital world. Accessibility assessments and audits of new software and AI need to be conducted to determine the level to which they are inclusive and to interrogate how they can be made more accessible. Crucially, persons with disabilities need to be meaningfully involved in the development, implementation and evaluation of programmes seeking to achieve digital inclusion.

29Dec

Ahouty Kouakou

Author CIPESA Posted on

Who is Ahouty Kouakou?

I am Ahouty Kouakou, an Ivorian living in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. I am a wheelchair user. I contracted this mobility impairment due to poliomyelitis when I was 4 years old. My disability did not, however, prevent me from attending school and pursuing higher university studies. Today, I hold two bachelor’s degrees in Communication and Anthropology from the University Felix Houphouet Boigny of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. I have also attended several short courses and earned certificates. In 2013, my ambition to transform the lives of marginalised communities drove me to establish a disability rights organisation called Action et Humanisme, to give persons with disabilities a chance to reach their full potential and thrive, utilising various factors, including digital technology. My work has been recognised internationally. For example, I am a 2022 D30 Disability Impact List Honoree of Diversability, an international organisation dedicated to empowering persons with disabilities.

My motivation came from the realisation that while the Internet and other emerging technologies offered great opportunities online, access was not guaranteed to persons with disabilities. The lack of Internet infrastructure in remote areas and the high cost of Internet data and technology devices meant that persons with disabilities, the majority of whom do not have the necessary resources, were excluded from the digital world. Most of the local cyber cafes were, and still are, inaccessible to persons with disabilities due to the lack of ramps and elevators. Digital illiteracy is also a significant barrier. Additionally, there is a lack of political will and strong digital enforcement by African governments. Persons with disabilities, therefore, miss out on several opportunities, including education, access to quality information, entertainment, and job opportunities, that are offered online. These issues drove me to become a frontline defender of digital rights for persons with disabilities. I believe in our mantra of leaving no one behind.

Calls are being made for harmonised legal frameworks and more consistent accessibility standards in both public and private sectors.

The African Union Protocol on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has entered into force, strengthening their rights to barrier-free access to the physical environment, transportation, and information.

Access to digital services can transform the lives of persons with disabilities in Africa, opening doors to education, employment, and civic participation.

There are several emerging threats to achieving digital rights and inclusion for persons with disabilities in Africa, such as

  • Some of the policies are not disability friendly and offer lip service to the digital rights of persons with disabilities.
  • The lack of accessibility: progress in digital accessibility for persons with disabilities is slow, uneven, and inequitable.
  •  High rates of illiteracy and poverty hinder access to technologies such as smartphones and computers.
  •  The high cost of internet data.
  •  The risk associated with Artificial Intelligence for persons with disabilities.
  •  The lack of knowledge about digital citizenship and the associated risks of the internet.

To cope with these issues, we can:

  • Strengthen the sensitisation and education of persons with disabilities on digital citizenship and online threats.
  • Partner with governments and enterprises to make technology and websites accessible to persons with disabilities.
  • Support under-resourced human rights and organisations of persons with disabilities through grants and capacity building so that they can effectively advocate for the rights of persons with disabilities.
  • Mitigate the digital divide by enhancing access to technology and offering training to individuals with disabilities.

  • Establish multi-stakeholder partnerships and work in synergy to achieve the goals of disability rights and inclusion.
  • African governments must take concrete action to implement digital laws that promote the digital inclusion of persons with disabilities.
  • Promote international cooperation to pool efforts.
  • Encourage collaboration across human rights movements.

Strengthen policy and regulatory frameworks to enable women, young people, older persons, and persons with disabilities to access digital technology effectively.

Promote access to education and digital skills in schools and within communities.

Develop inclusive digital social protection systems to meet the needs of marginalised communities in Africa, including women, youth, and persons with disabilities.

Support organisations and initiatives that defend and promote the interests of persons with disabilities in Africa. Most organisations lack funding to develop solutions that contribute to improving the quality of life for persons with disabilities.

Put in place mechanisms that include persons with disabilities in the decision-making process when it directly affects them. Nothing about us without us!

15Dec

Inform Africa Expands OSINT Training and DISARM-Based Research With CIPESA

Author CIPESA Posted on

ADRF |

Information integrity work is only as strong as the methods behind it. In Ethiopia’s fast-changing information environment, fact-checkers and researchers are expected to move quickly while maintaining accuracy, transparency, and ethical care. Inform Africa has expanded two practical capabilities to address this reality: advanced OSINT-based fact-checking training and structured disinformation research using the DISARM framework, in collaboration with the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA).

This work was advanced with support from the Africa Digital Rights Fund (ADRF), administered by CIPESA. At a time when many civic actors face uncertainty, the fund’s adaptable support helped Inform Africa sustain day-to-day operations and protect continuity, while still investing in verification and research methods designed to endure beyond a single project cycle.

The collaboration with CIPESA was not only administrative. It was anchored in shared priorities around digital rights, information integrity, and capacity building. Through structured coordination and learning exchange, CIPESA provided a partnership channel that strengthened the work’s clarity and relevance, and helped position the outputs as reusable methods that can be applied beyond a single team. The collaboration also reinforced a regional ecosystem approach: improving practice in one context while keeping the methods legible for peer learning, adaptation, and future joint work.

The implementation followed a phased timetable across the project activity period from April through November 2025. Early work focused on scoping and method design, aligning the training and research approaches with practical realities in newsrooms and civil society. Mid-phase work concentrated on developing the OSINT module and applying DISARM as a structured research lens, with iterative refinement as materials matured. The final phase focused on consolidation, documentation discipline, and packaging the outputs to support repeatable use, including onboarding, internal training, and incident review workflows.

A central focus has been an advanced OSINT training module built to move beyond tool familiarity into a complete verification workflow. Verification is treated as a chain of decisions that must be consistent and auditable: how to intake a claim, determine whether it is fact-checkable, plan the evidence, trace sources, verify images and videos, confirm the place and time, and document each step clearly enough for an editor or peer to reproduce the work. The aim is not only to reach accurate conclusions but also to show the route taken, including which evidence was prioritized and how uncertainty was handled.

This documentation discipline is not bureaucracy. It is a trust technology. In high-risk information environments, preserved sources, verification logs, and clear decision trails protect credibility, strengthen editorial oversight, and reduce avoidable errors. The module prioritizes hands-on, production-style assignments that mirror real newsroom constraints and trains participants to avoid overclaiming, communicate uncertainty responsibly, and present evidence in ways that non-expert audiences can follow.

In parallel, Inform Africa has applied the DISARM framework to disinformation research. DISARM provides a shared language for describing influence activity through observable behaviors and techniques, without drifting into assumptions. The priority has been to remain evidence-bound: collecting and preserving artifacts responsibly, maintaining a structured evidence log, reducing harm by avoiding unnecessary reproduction of inflammatory content, and avoiding claims of attribution beyond what the evidence supports. This DISARM-informed approach has improved internal briefs, strengthened consistency, and made incidents easier to compare over time and across partners.

Three lessons stand out from this work with CIPESA and ADRF. First, quality scales through workflow, not only through talent. Second, evidence discipline is a strategic choice that protects credibility and reduces harm in both fact-checking and research. Third, shared frameworks reduce friction by improving clarity and consistency across teams. Looking ahead, Inform Africa will integrate the OSINT module into routine training and onboarding and continue to apply DISARM-informed analysis in future incident reviews and deeper studies, reinforcing information integrity as a public good.

This article was first published by Informa Africa on December 15, 2025

02Dec

#BeSafeByDesign: A Call To Platforms To Ensure Women’s Online Safety

Author CIPESA Posted on

By CIPESA Writer |

Across Eastern and Southern Africa, activists, journalists, and women human rights defenders (WHRDs) are leveraging online spaces to mobilise for justice, equality, and accountability.  However, the growth of online harms such as Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV), disinformation, digital surveillance, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven discrimination and attacks has outpaced the development of robust protections.

Notably, human rights defenders, journalists, and activists face unique and disproportionate digital security threats, including harassment, doxxing, and data breaches, that limit their participation and silence dissent.

It is against this background that the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), in partnership with Irene M. Staehelin Foundation, is implementing a project aimed at combating online harms so as to advance digital rights. Through upskilling, advocacy, research, and movement building, the initiative addresses the growing threats in digital spaces, particularly affecting women journalists and human rights defenders.

The first of the upskilling engagements kicked off in Nairobi, Kenya, at the start of December 2025, with 25 women human rights defenders and activists in a three-day digital resilience skills share workshop hosted by CIPESA and the Digital Society Africa. Participants came from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Malawi, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. It coincides with the December 16 Days Of Activism campaign, which this year is themed “Unite to End Digital Violence against All Women and Girls”.

According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), TFGBV is “an act of violence perpetrated by one or more individuals that is committed, assisted, aggravated, and amplified in part or fully by the use of information and communication technologies or digital media against a person based on their gender.” It includes cyberstalking, doxing, non-consensual sharing of intimate images, cyberbullying, and other forms of online harassment.

Women in Sub-Saharan Africa are 32% less likely than men to use the internet, with the key impediments being literacy and digital skills, affordability, safety, and security. On top of this gender digital divide, more women than men face various forms of digital violence. Accordingly, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolution 522 of 2022 has underscored the urgent need for African states to address online violence against women and girls.

Women who advocate for gender equality, feminism, and sexual minority rights face higher levels of online violence. Indeed, women human rights defenders, journalists and politicians are the most affected by TFGBV, and many of them have withdrawn from the digital public sphere due to gendered disinformation, trolling, cyber harassment, and other forms of digital violence. The online trolling of women is growing exponentially and often takes the form of gendered and sexualised attacks and body shaming.

Several specific challenges must be considered when designing interventions to combat TFGBV. These challenges are shaped by legal, social, technological, and cultural factors, which affect both the prevalence of digital harms and violence and the ability to respond effectively. They include weak and inadequate legal frameworks; a lack of awareness about TFGBV among policymakers, law enforcement officers, and the general public; the gender digital divide; and normalised online abuse against women, with victims often blamed rather than supported.

Moreover, there is a shortage of comprehensive response mechanisms and support services for survivors of online harassment, such as digital security helplines, psychosocial support, and legal aid. On the other hand, there is limited regional and cross-sector collaboration between CSOs, government agencies, and the private sector (including tech companies).

A guiding strand for these efforts will be the #BeSafeByDesign campaign that highlights the necessity of safe platforms for women as well as the consequences when safety is missing. The #BeSafeByDesign obligation shifts the burden of responsibility of ensuring safety in online spaces away from women and places it on platforms where more efforts on risk assessments, accessible and stronger reporting pathways, proactive detection of abuse, and transparent accountability mechanisms are required. The initiative will also involve the practical upskilling of at-risk women in practical cybersecurity.

14Nov

Advancing African-Centred AI is a Priority for Development in Africa

Author CIPESA Posted on

By Patricia Ainembabazi |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) participated in the annual DataFest Africa event held on 30-31 October, 2025. Hosted by Pollicy, the event serves to celebrate data use in Africa by bringing together various stakeholders from diverse backgrounds, such as government, civil society, donors, academics, students, and private industry experts, under one roof and theme.  The event provided a timely platform to advance discussions on how Africa can harness AI and data-driven systems in ways that centre human rights, accountability, and social impact.

CIPESA featured in various sessions at the event, one of which was the launch of the ‘Made in Africa AI for Monitoring, Evaluation, Research and Learning (MERL)’ Landscape Study by the MERL Tech Initiative. At the session, CIPESA provided reflections on the role of AI in development across several humanitarian sectors in Africa.

CIPESA’s contributions complemented insights from the study that explored African approaches to AI in data-driven evidence systems and which emphasised responsive and inclusive design, contextual relevance, and ethical deployment. The Study resonated with insights from the CIPESA 2025 State of Internet Freedom in Africa report, which highlights the role of AI as  Africa navigates digital democracy.

According to the CIPESA report, AI technologies hold significant potential to improve civic engagement, extend access to public services, scale multilingual communication tools, and support fact-checking and content moderation. On the flip side, the MERL study also underscores the risks posed by AI systems that lack robust governance frameworks, including increased surveillance capacity, algorithmic bias, the spread of misinformation, and deepening digital exclusion. The aforementioned risks and challenges pose major concerns regarding readiness, accountability, and institutional capacity, given the nascent and fragmented legal and regulatory landscape for AI in the majority of African countries..

Sam Kuuku, Head of the GIZ-African Union AI Made in Africa Project, noted that it is important for countries and stakeholders to reflect on how well Africa can measure the impact of AI and evaluate the role and potential of AI use in improving livelihoods across the continent. He further reiterated the value of various European Union (EU) frameworks in providing useful guidance for African countries seeking to develop AI policies that promote both innovation and safety, to ensure that technological developments align with public interest, legal safeguards, and global standards.

The session was underscored by the need for African governments and stakeholders to benchmark global regulatory practices that are grounded in human rights principles for progressive adoption and deployment of AI.  CIPESA pointed out the EU AI Act of 2024, which offers a structured and risk-based model that categorises AI systems according to the level of potential harm and establishes controls for transparency, safety, and non-discrimination.

Key considerations for labour rights, economic justice, and the future of work were highlighted, particularly in relation to the growing role of African data annotators and platform workers within global AI supply chains. Investigations into outsourced data labelling, such as the case of Kenyan workers contracted by tech platforms to train AI models under precarious economic conditions, underlie the need for stronger labour protections and ethical AI sourcing practices. Through platforms such as DataFest Africa, there is a growing community dedicated towards shaping a forward-looking narrative in which AI is not only applied to solve African problems but is also developed, regulated, and critiqued by African actors. The pathway to an inclusive and rights-respecting digital future will rely on working collectively to embed accountability, transparency, and local expertise within emerging AI and data governance frameworks.

1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 34