Forum Explores How Foreign Interference Threatens Information Integrity in Africa

By Edrine Wanyama |

On February 10-11, 2026, researchers and experts convened in Dakar, Senegal, for the first Africa Forum on Countering Foreign Interference (CFI). The forum brought together participants from Africa, Europe and America to examine the growing challenge of foreign information manipulation and its implications for governance, media ecosystems, and digital rights across the African continent.

The Forum was organised under the CFI project implemented by the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), in cooperation with the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI) at the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS). The project aims to strengthen EU capacities to prevent, deter and counter information manipulation in the digital space. 

Around the world, foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI) has become a major threat to information integrity, human rights, democratic discourse, and public trust. In Africa, the phenomenon has taken on new dimensions as geopolitical competition plays out in the digital sphere. Already, many African countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya and South Africa are facing a complex terrain of disinformation. Consequently, disinformation practices are expected to continue shaping and adversely affecting human rights and democracy, amidst the growing repression and curtailment of digital spaces in  Africa. 

Foreign state and non-state actors have been linked to sponsorship of disinformation campaigns in Africa, to promote their strategic, political and business interests. They include China with its authoritarian capitalism agenda and Israel with its strategic security agenda. Similarly, Russia aims to displace Western influence in Africa, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which are in rivalry over ports and the strategic security architecture of the Red Sea, and Qatar with mass economic interests. The United States of America is also associated with the drive of narratives that seek to neutralise its adversaries, especially China and Russia, and also to secure and utilise critical minerals from the African continent in countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia.

The forum highlighted the critical role of independent research in understanding disinformation trends, causes, effects and control measures, local socio-political dynamics, and media ecosystems.

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), the European University Institute, Tech Global Institute, International Press Institute, Media Monitoring Africa, Moxii Africa and Intelwatch, shared insights on potential response strategies to counter information manipulation. In particular, CIPESA stressed that efforts to counter information manipulation must safeguard human rights and should not be used as a justification for restrictive policies that undermine digital rights.

Participants at the Dakar forum noted that Africa’s information ecosystem faces various vulnerabilities that make it susceptible to manipulation. Limited access to data, under-resourced research institutions, inappropriate legal frameworks, and financial pressures within the media sector were noted as major challenges.

Today, foreign agents account for the extension of disinformation machinery with troll farms, local influencers and bots deployed across the continent to influence and shape public narratives and perceptions. Similarly, a multiplicity of lies are told about mining, trade and investment, security structures, agriculture and education sectors on the continent as a tool to help investors secure contracts without public participation and scrutiny.

Journalism, which is a key sector that should promote transparency and accountability, has not been spared by FIMI. Economic pressures faced by the local media and media actors make them susceptible to influence from foreign actors.

In other circumstances, they have been sighted to enter into agreements and memorandums of understanding which largely undermine media professionalism and integrity. Such undertakings are emerging as conduits for propaganda and carry the largest portion of blame for a declining media profession.

Unfortunately, Journalists and media practitioners opposed to the agreements and distorted narratives are often harassed and intimidated to pave the way for gendered disinformation or become primary targets of fellow practitioners who are often paid off or are benefiting from foreign actors.

Notably, African regional human rights institutions and civic actors are increasingly engaging with the issue of information integrity. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) has acknowledged the risks posed by the growing foreign interference in the digital space. Its Resolution 630, issued in 2025, in paragraph 7 specifically addresses the need for technology companies to maintain information integrity. It observes that foreign interference is potentially harmful to information integrity.

Furthermore, the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information is currently developing guidelines aimed at supporting African states to address harmful content without undermining fundamental freedoms.

Civil society organisations like CIPESA also play a vital role in these conversations by advocating for the rights-respecting governance of platforms, transparency in content moderation and improved accountability measures for tech companies.

Participants at the Dakar forum made several recommendations:

  • Multi-stakeholder collaboration to counter foreign interference by involving governments, civil society, researchers, media organisations and technology companies.
  • Strengthening independent media through the creation of national and regional funds to support investigative journalism and reduce vulnerability to foreign influence.
  • Conducting training for journalists to identify and counter FIMI.
  • Conducting nationwide media and digital literacy to help citizens guard against FIMI.
  • Governments should undertake measures including collective negotiation with multi-national tech companies to ensure effective content moderation by platforms.
  • Governments should support ACHPR processes to counter FIMI, such as through timely provision of resources and implementation of its resolutions.
  • Promote transparency in strategic sectors such as mining and energy by requiring full public disclosure of contracts  to guard against disinformation.

2nd East Africa Data Governance Conference 2026

Event |

Location: Nairobi
Dates: 10 – 11 March 2026

CIPESA is participating in the 2nd East Africa Data Governance Conference held in Nairobi, Kenya, on March 10 and 11, 2026, convened under the theme ‘Navigating Duality in Data Governance: Innovation and Accountability in East Africa’. 

Innovation and accountability are often treated as competing imperatives. In reality, they must evolve together. The 2026 theme focuses on the duality that defines East Africa’s digital moment: a region building new systems of data-driven governance while grappling with heightened concerns around privacy, power, surveillance, exclusion, and fragmentation. The conference explores how East Africa can build digital governance ecosystems that enable innovation without sacrificing justice, rights, or public trust.

The conference features sessions on regulatory sandboxes as governance instruments for DPI – a space of active interest to CIPESA as we develop our thinking on rights-centred approaches to digital infrastructure governance in East Africa.

CIPESA Supports African Editors in Demands for Media Freedom, Information Integrity, and Data Access Rights

By Staff Writer |

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress 2026, held on February 23-24, 2026, assembled over 150 of Africa’s senior editors, newsroom leaders, and media executives from across the continent. The Congress sought to confront the various threats that contemporary journalism faces. A key theme emerging from deliberations was that in the age of artificial intelligence and the increasing concentration of power by platforms, journalism is more essential to democracy than it has ever been.

A communiqué emerging from the Congress articulated various arguments for reclaiming media value, rebuilding public trust, and redefining sustainable journalism in Africa’s increasingly digital landscape. The media is navigating an ever-changing information ecosystem where platform dominance, algorithmic opacity, media viability challenges, and the weaponisation of digital infrastructure itself have made the practice of independent journalism exponentially harder.

The Congress called for urgent structural reforms to safeguard information integrity and the sustainability of independent journalism in the face of platform dominance, fragile business models, and the rapid evolution of digital repression. These priorities align with the work of the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), which aims to promote the effective and inclusive use of ICT for improved governance and livelihoods in Africa.

During the Congress, CIPESA presented on the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolution 620: “Guidelines on Promoting and Harnessing Data Access for Advancing Human Rights in the Digital Age,” which establishes that journalists must have meaningful access to both public and platform-held data to conduct investigative reporting and hold power to account. The Congress’s communiqué reinforces this principle, recognising that data is indispensable for modern investigative journalism and democratic accountability.

Communiqué of the Inaugural Africa Editors Congress

Nairobi, Kenya | 5 March 2026

At a defining moment of profound transformation for journalism, democracy, and the global information ecosystem, editors and media leaders from across Africa convened in Nairobi for the inaugural Africa Editors Congress, organised by The African Editors Forum (TAEF) on February 23-24, 2026. Bringing together editorial leadership from diverse regions of Africa and the world, markets, and media traditions, the Congress marked a significant step toward building coordinated continental responses to the structural challenges reshaping journalism and public-interest information ecosystems.

Participants acknowledged that African journalism is confronting a convergence of pressures: platform dominance, rapid technological disruption, shifting audience behaviour, and fragile business models. Deliberations addressed both the economics and the practice of journalism, recognising that financial sustainability and editorial integrity are mutually reinforcing foundations of credible public-interest media. A central focus of the Congress was the growing impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism, and the urgent need to entrench ethical AI use in newsrooms while establishing fair and transparent compensation frameworks.

The Congress affirmed that independent journalism is an essential infrastructure for democratic and economic development. Markets, institutions, and public policy processes cannot function effectively without access to trusted information and data. The sustainability crisis confronting journalism, therefore, represents not only an industry challenge but a broader developmental risk for African economies and democratic processes.

Editors emphasised that rebuilding trust requires renewed commitment to strong professional practice alongside adaptation to a rapidly evolving information ecosystem. Participants recognised that public-interest content is increasingly produced beyond traditional newsroom structures, and that self-regulatory bodies should be broadened to include content creators committed to accountability, transparency, and accuracy while maintaining defined professional standards.

Participants expressed concern that existing copyright regimes were not designed for the large-scale extraction and use of journalistic content by generative AI systems. Discussions emphasised the need for rights-based approaches that secure equitable value for journalistic work, strengthen African agency within the global technology ecosystem, and address power imbalances between media organisations and dominant platforms. Competition-based remedies and coordinated regulatory approaches, such as the South African Competition Commission’s Media and Digital Platforms Market Inquiry report, were identified as important reference points for advancing sustainable outcomes in Africa.

Participants agreed that fragmented responses by individual African publishers or national markets are insufficient to address systemic challenges. Coalition-building and coordinated continental advocacy were identified as essential to shifting structural imbalances and ensuring that African perspectives shape global debates on media sustainability, technology governance, and information integrity. These include advancing normative frameworks such as the M20 Johannesburg Declaration and Resolutions 620, 630, and 631 of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), which carry direct implications for the path of African media within shifting technology ecosystems. Enhanced collaboration in policy-making processes is fundamental to building the African media’s agency in the global tech ecosystem and to strengthening public interest journalism on the continent. Delegates appreciate growing attention from the African Union (AU) on matters of media freedom, especially through the ACHPR, and propose more collaborative efforts between editors and the continental/regional and sub-regional mechanisms to promote media freedom and sustainability.

The Congress highlighted several areas of emerging consensus and ongoing work:

a)           Development of coordinated frameworks for collective engagement with global technology platforms, including approaches to fair compensation, bargaining power, and access to data.

b)          Advancement of public-interest-oriented regulatory frameworks aligned with digital realities and freedom of expression principles.

c)           Strengthening African editors’ societies as key institutional pillars for advocacy, coordination, and professional solidarity.

d)          Expansion of collaborative editorial strategies to improve coverage of emerging economic domains shaping Africa’s future, including technology and extractive sectors.

e)           Exploration of mechanisms to support small and community newsrooms through shared services, collaboration, and sustainable funding pathways.

f)            Continued dialogue on African-led funding approaches that reinforce editorial independence and long-term resilience.

Participants noted that existing continental mechanisms have not sufficiently prioritised coordinated responses to the structural challenges facing journalism. In this context, the Congress resolved that TAEF should be strengthened and properly resourced to serve as a central convening and coordinating platform capable of advancing shared priorities across the continent.

The Congress further resolved to:

i) Strengthen cross-border collaboration among African newsrooms and ethical public-interest content creators.

ii) Advance rights-based approaches to media regulation that protect freedom of expression and access to information while addressing harms within digital information environments.

iii) Promote high standards of journalistic practice that contribute to informed public discourse, accountable governance, and inclusive economic development.

iv) Facilitate evidence-based research, knowledge exchange, and capacity-building initiatives driven by African leadership.

v) Engage constructively with policymakers, regulators, civil society, and global partners to ensure African editorial perspectives inform governance debates shaping the future of information ecosystems.

vi) Journalism/media and communications training in colleges and universities should update and incorporate these resolutions into their professional training tool kit.

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress represents an important milestone toward building a unified, resilient, and forward-looking African public-interest media ecosystem grounded in collaboration, collective leadership, and shared responsibility for strengthening democratic and economic resilience across the continent.

Adopted in Nairobi, Kenya, on 24 February 2026

Endorsed by the following partners:

  • Media Leadership Think Tank, GIBS
  • Network of Independent Media Councils in Africa (NIMCA)
  • SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition
  • Wits Centre for Journalism, South Africa
  • Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)
  • M20

About The African Editors Forum (TAEF)

The Africa Editors Forum (TAEF) is a continental network of editors, senior newsroom leaders, and media executives committed to strengthening independent journalism and advancing media freedom across Africa. TAEF works to promote ethical standards, defend press freedom, deepen professional solidarity, and support editorial innovation in response to the evolving political, economic, and technological landscape shaping the continent. Through convenings such as the Africa Editors Congress and strategic partnerships with regional and global institutions, TAEF provides a platform for dialogue on journalism’s role in democracy, development, and African agency in emerging domains. The Forum also champions fair compensation for journalism as a public good, newsroom resilience in the digital age, and collaborative responses to threats facing journalists and media organisations. TAEF serves as a collective voice for Africa’s editors, advancing a journalism culture rooted in independence, public interest, and lasting excellence.

MOSIP Connect 2026 Calls for Scalable, Country-Driven Digital Public Infrastructure

By Milliam Murigi |

African governments have been urged to move beyond pilot projects and develop a Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) that is open, secure, nationally owned and capable of operating at a full national scale to truly serve citizens.

This call was made today in Morocco during the launch of the MOSIP Connect 2026 conference. Speaking at the event, Prof. Debabrata Das, Director of the International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) – Bangalore, emphasized that DPI cannot remain at the pilot stage indefinitely.

“DPI must be scaled to operate at national levels,” he said, highlighting that such systems are not just technology projects but national assets that underpin citizens’ access to services like education, health, social protection, and payments.

DPI refers to government-backed digital systems and platforms designed to provide citizens with secure, accessible, and efficient services. These systems include national digital IDs, e-government portals, digital payment platforms, and health and social service databases.

Across Africa, countries are making significant strides in implementing DPI, though progress varies widely. Ghana’s national ID system, the Ghana Card, has been linked to banking, mobile verification, and social services, while Rwanda has achieved over 90 percent coverage of adults with digital IDs integrated into multiple government services.

Kenya’s Maisha Namba program seeks to consolidate several identity databases into a single, unified platform. Despite these advances, many initiatives remain fragmented or confined to pilot projects, limiting their ability to deliver services nationwide.

Prof. Das stressed that for DPI to deliver real public value, it must be open-source, secure, respect national and data sovereignty, and be designed to evolve with changing policies, technologies, and citizen needs.

“DPI is not regular software development. When embraced, it becomes part of the relationship between citizens and the state. That means it must be based on evidence, transparency, accountability and continuous learning.”

According to him, six principles should guide next-generation DPI development: open-source technology, respect for national and data sovereignty, neutrality in partnerships, reusability of systems, commitment to national-scale deployment and the ability to evolve as policies, technologies and citizens’ needs change.

Additionally, he added that building successful national digital systems requires three elements working together: strong technology platforms and standards, governance structures that ensure accountability, and institutional and user capacity to adopt the systems. Without all three, pilot programs risk failing to scale.

“Data creates power. Countries must retain control over the data generated through digital systems. This is why sovereignty considerations are central to MOSIP’s approach when working with governments,” he added.

The Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP) a IIIT-Bangalore project, offers countries modular and open-source technology to build and own their national identity systems. The project aims to provide governments with the tools for meaningful digital transformation, established on a bedrock of good principles and human-centric design.

Speaking at the same event, Abdelhak Harrak, Director of Information Systems and Telecommunications, Ministry of the Interior, Kingdom of Morocco said that the success of a digital identification system does not rely solely on technical solutions, however advanced they may be, it also depends on strong governance and the sustained mobilization of teams responsible for rigorously managing complex transformations involving numerous field actors. It is this synergy that ensures both the security and the sustainability of a national identification system.

“Technology alone cannot drive change; it is the alignment of people, processes, and purpose that turns innovation into lasting impact,” said Harrak.

He also highlighted the role of private-sector and civil-society partners in building sustainable digital ecosystems. He described them as “essential” rather than peripheral, noting that innovation often comes from organizations that build localized solutions on top of open platforms.

This article was first published by Science Africa on February 12, 2026.

African Media Festival 

Event |

Date: 24-25 February, 2026

Location: Nairobi, Kenya 

The Africa Media Festival is a gathering for journalists, editors, storytellers, creators, and media builders from across the continent and the diaspora.

The festival is a meeting place for those working in reporting, production, technology and creative enterprise who are asking real questions about the future of media and how it is made, funded and sustained.

This year’s edition continues to expand pathways for participation across Africa and beyond. The two days of conversation, learning and collaboration will centre on the ideas, challenges and opportunities shaping media and creative work today.