Promoting Effective and Inclusive ICT Policy in Africa

Tag Archives: platform accountability

  HomeCollaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)  /  platform accountability
19Mar

Webinar: Advancing Platform Accountability for Women’s Online Safety in Africa

Author CIPESA Posted on

By CIPESA Writer |

The right to freedom of information, access to information, and democratic engagement belongs equally to all citizens. Yet across Africa, women and girls continue to face significant barriers that prevent them from exercising these foundational rights in digital spaces. This calls for urgent legal and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that women and girls can safely access, contribute to, and participate in information ecosystems. Furthermore, social media and Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms must address the gendered concerns that impact women’s experiences in online spaces, including disproportionate online harassment, algorithmic discrimination, and digital exclusion. See more here.

In support of this year’s International Women’s Day (IWD) commemoration, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) is hosting a webinar titled “Advancing Platform Accountability for Women’s Online Safety in Africa” on Thursday, 19 March 2026 (14:00–15:30 EAT). The webinar resonates with this year’s IWD theme: “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls.”

Register for the webinar here.

The webinar brings together experts to discuss what efforts are being made to enhance the safety of women in online spaces and to hold platforms accountable. It supports the sentiments of United Nations (UN) General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock, who last week, in her opening remarks at the 70th UN Commission on the Status of Women, noted that the gaps in legal rights afforded to women are deliberate. She stated that “these are not oversights but deliberate choices — choices that violate the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and 70 years of commitments made in this Commission.”

This webinar serves as a platform for discussion and insight into the various efforts needed to address these gaps. The discussion is open to all and features expert panelists from diverse backgrounds with a vested interest in advancing the safety of women in online spaces.

Meet the Panelists

Barbra Okafor | Founder and Lead Strategist, The Agency Lab

Barbra is the Founder of The Agency Lab, an initiative empowering African creatives and organisations to secure data ownership, protect Intellectual Property (IP), and navigate fair compensation in the AI economy. Drawing on her previous roles as Content Programming Lead at TikTok Sub-Saharan Africa and Senior Producer at BBC Media Action, Barbra translates complex digital transitions into actionable strategies. Her work sits at the critical intersection of the African creator economy, technology, and governance.

Marie-Simone Kadurira | Feminist researcher and communications strategist

Marie-Simone works at the intersection of gender, technology, and social justice. Her work focuses on technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV), digital rights, and the ways in which online platforms shape access, safety, and agency for women and marginalised communities. She has contributed to research and advocacy efforts examining how online harms disproportionately affect women, particularly in the Global South, and has worked with international organisations to develop policy and communications strategies aimed at strengthening platform accountability and advancing safer digital environments. Her work engages with questions of governance, content moderation, and the structural inequalities embedded within digital ecosystems. She is currently engaged in research on gender-based violence prevention and supports initiatives that centre community-led approaches to justice, safety, and digital inclusion.

Mercy Mutemi | Executive Director, The Oversight Lab Africa

Mercy’s work advocates for fair regulation and deployment of technology across Africa. She focuses on restorative and retributive justice solutions for those who have been harmed by technology. This includes workers who have been exploited to build and maintain technological systems and those who have been harmed by algorithms.  She has worked on several cases and initiatives focused on addressing inequality and the unconsidered consequences of tech algorithms for African communities and societies. She currently represents a cohort of content moderators based throughout Africa in a suit over workplace human rights violations.

Abdul Waiswa | Head of Litigation, Prosecution and Legal Advisory, Uganda Communications Commission

Waiswa works as the Head of Litigation, Prosecution and Legal Advice at the Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), which is the statutory regulator of the converged communications sector in Uganda, with a mandate to license, supervise, and facilitate the development of a robust communication sector in Uganda. He oversees the legal advisory, licensing, and enforcement functions of UCC and supports the implementation of the Government of Uganda’s policies on ICT. Waiswa is a regular participant in national, regional, and international engagements on internet jurisdiction, data, and other ICT-related policy matters.

Lilian Nalwoga | Programme Manager, CIPESA

Lillian has several years of ICT policy research and advocacy experience, having joined the CIPESA as a Policy Officer in 2007. She has facilitated and coordinated ICT policy workshops – including coordinating the East African Internet Governance Forum. Lillian has a Bachelors of Development Studies (Makerere University, Uganda) with a Postgraduate Diploma in Project Management as well as advanced training in Internet studies. She holds a Master’s in Digital Media and Society from Uppsala University, Sweden. She is also the former President of the Internet Society (ISOC) Uganda.

The webinar forms part of the #BeSafeByDesign campaign, which calls for improved platform accountability in Africa. The campaign is part of a project supported by the Irene M. Staehelin Foundation. Since December 2025, the project has pursued a series of collaborative activities aimed at improving online safety and governance. These included a convening in Nairobi, Kenya, which served as the launch of the #BeSafeByDesign campaign. The convening assembled human rights defenders and activists from eight African countries for upskilling in digital resilience. In February 2026, a meeting held in Port Louis, Mauritius brought together 30 participants — including judges, magistrates, law enforcement officers, communications regulators, data protection authorities, and National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs). Participants recommended that African governments strengthen their engagement with big tech companies through regional mechanisms, such as the African Union, to present a more coordinated voice on issues of platform accountability.

31Oct

Applications are Open for a New Round of Africa Digital Rights Funding!

Author CIPESA Posted on

Announcement |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) is calling for proposals to support digital rights work across Africa.

This call for proposals is the 10th under the CIPESA-run Africa Digital Rights Fund (ADRF) initiative that provides rapid response and flexible grants to organisations and networks to implement activities that promote digital rights and digital democracy, including advocacy, litigation, research, policy analysis, skills development, and movement building.

 The current call is particularly interested in proposals for work related to:

  • Data governance including aspects of data localisation, cross-border data flows, biometric databases, and digital ID.
  • Digital resilience for human rights defenders, other activists and journalists.
  • Censorship and network disruptions.
  • Digital economy.
  • Digital inclusion, including aspects of accessibility for persons with disabilities.
  • Disinformation and related digital harms.
  • Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV).
  • Platform accountability and content moderation.
  • Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
  • Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI).

Grant amounts available range between USD 5,000 and USD 25,000 per applicant, depending on the need and scope of the proposed intervention. Cost-sharing is strongly encouraged, and the grant period should not exceed eight months. Applications will be accepted until November 17, 2025. 

Since its launch in April 2019, the ADRF has provided initiatives across Africa with more than one million US Dollars and contributed to building capacity and traction for digital rights advocacy on the continent.  

Application Guidelines

Geographical Coverage

The ADRF is open to organisations/networks based or operational in Africa and with interventions covering any country on the continent.

Size of Grants

Grant size shall range from USD 5,000 to USD 25,000. Cost sharing is strongly encouraged.

Eligible Activities

The activities that are eligible for funding are those that protect and advance digital rights and digital democracy. These may include but are not limited to research, advocacy, engagement in policy processes, litigation, digital literacy and digital security skills building. 

Duration

The grant funding shall be for a period not exceeding eight months.

Eligibility Requirements

  • The Fund is open to organisations and coalitions working to advance digital rights and digital democracy in Africa. This includes but is not limited to human rights defenders, media, activists, think tanks, legal aid groups, and tech hubs. Entities working on women’s rights, or with youth, refugees, persons with disabilities, and other marginalised groups are strongly encouraged to apply.
  • The initiatives to be funded will preferably have formal registration in an African country, but in some circumstances, organisations and coalitions that do not have formal registration may be considered. Such organisations need to show evidence that they are operational in a particular African country or countries.
  • The activities to be funded must be in/on an African country or countries.

Ineligible Activities

  • The Fund shall not fund any activity that does not directly advance digital rights or digital democracy.
  • The Fund will not support travel to attend conferences or workshops, except in exceptional circumstances where such travel is directly linked to an activity that is eligible.
  • Costs that have already been incurred are ineligible.
  • The Fund shall not provide scholarships.
  • The Fund shall not support equipment or asset acquisition.

Administration

The Fund is administered by CIPESA. An internal and external panel of experts will make decisions on beneficiaries based on the following criteria:

  • If the proposed intervention fits within the Fund’s digital rights priorities.
  • The relevance to the given context/country.
  • Commitment and experience of the applicant in advancing digital rights and digital democracy.
  • Potential impact of the intervention on digital rights and digital democracy policies or practices.

The deadline for submissions is Monday, November 17, 2025. The application form can be accessed here.

African Woman on Social Media
22May

Africa’s Digital Dilemma: Platform Regulation Vs Internet Freedom

Author Brian Posted on

By Brian Byaruhanga |

Imagine waking up to find Facebook and Instagram inaccessible on your phone – not due to a network disruption, but because the platforms pulled their services out of your country. This scenario now looms over Nigeria, as Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, may shut down its services in Nigeria over nearly USD 290 million in regulatory fines. The fines stem from allegations of anti-competitive practices, data privacy violations, and unregulated advertising content contrary to the national laws. Nigerian authorities insist the company must comply with national laws, especially those governing user data and competition. 

While this standoff centres on Nigeria, it signals a deeper struggle across Africa as governments assert digital sovereignty over global tech platforms. At the same time, millions of citizens rely on these platforms for communication, activism, access to health and education, economic livelihood, and self-expression. Striking a balance between regulation and rights in Africa’s evolving digital landscape has never been more urgent.

Meta versus Nigeria: Not Just One Country’s Battle

The tension between Meta and Nigeria is not new, nor is it unique. Similar dynamics have played out elsewhere on the continent:

  • Uganda (2021–Present): The Ugandan government blocked Facebook after the platform removed accounts linked to state actors during the 2021 elections. The block remains in place, effectively cutting off millions from a critical social media service unless they use Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to circumvent the blockage.
  • Senegal (2023): TikTok was suspended amid political unrest, with authorities citing the app’s use for spreading misinformation and hate speech.
  • Ethiopia (2022): Facebook and Twitter were accused of amplifying hate speech during internal conflicts, prompting pressure for tighter oversight.
  • South Africa (2025): In a February 2025 report, the Competition Commission found that freedom of expression, plurality and diversity of media in South Africa had been severely infringed upon by platforms including Google and Facebook. 

The Double-Edged Sword of Regulation

Governments have legitimate reasons to demand transparency, data protection, and content moderation. Today, over two-thirds of African countries have legislation to protect personal data, and regulators are becoming more assertive. Nigeria’s Data Protection Commission (NDPC), created by a 2023 law, wasted little time in taking on a behemoth like Meta. Kenya also has an active Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, which has investigated and fined companies for data breaches. 

South Africa’s Information Regulator has been especially bold, issuing an enforcement notice to WhatsApp to comply with privacy standards after finding that the messaging service’s privacy policy in South Africa was different to that in the European Union. These actions send a clear message that privacy is a universal right, and Africans should not have weaker safeguards.

These regulatory institutions aim to ensure that citizens’ data is not exploited and that tech companies operate responsibly. Yet, in practice, digital regulation in Africa often walks a thin line between protecting rights and suppressing them.

While governments deserve scrutiny, platforms like Meta, TikTok, and X are not blameless. They often delay to respond to harmful content that fuels violence or division. Their algorithms can amplify hate, misinformation, and sensationalism, while opaque data harvesting practices continue to exploit users. For instance, Branch, a San Francisco-based microlending app operating in Kenya and Nigeria, collects extensive personal data such as handset details, SMS logs, GPS data, call records, and contact lists in exchange for small loans, sometimes for as little as USD 2. This exploitative business model capitalises on vulnerable socio-economic conditions, effectively forcing users to trade sensitive personal data for minimal financial relief.

Many African regulators are pushing back by demanding localisation of data, adherence to national laws, and greater responsiveness, but platform threats to exit rather than comply raise concerns of digital neo-colonialism where African countries are expected to accept second-tier treatment or risk exclusion.

Beyond privacy, African regulators are increasingly addressing monopolistic behaviour and unfair practices by Big Tech as part of a broader push for digital sovereignty. Nigeria’s USD 290 million fine against Meta is not just about data protection and privacy, but also fair competition, consumer rights, and the country’s authority to govern its digital space. Countries like Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya are asserting their right to regulate digital platforms within their borders, challenging the long-standing dominance of global tech firms. The actions taken against Meta highlight the growing complexity of balancing national interests with the transnational influence of tech giants. 

While Meta’s threat to exit may signal its discomfort with what it views as restrictive regulation, it also exposes the real struggle governments face in asserting control over digital infrastructure that often operates beyond state jurisdiction. Similarly, in other parts of Africa, there are inquiries and new policies targeting the market power of tech giants. For instance, South Africa’s competition authorities have looked at requiring Google and Facebook to compensate news publishers  (similar to the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code in Australia). These moves reflect a broader global concern that a few platforms have too much control over markets and need checks to ensure fairness.

The Cost of Disruption: Economic and Social Impacts

When platforms go dark, the consequences are swift:

  • Businesses and entrepreneurs lose access to vital marketing and sales tools.
  • Creators and influencers face income loss and audience disconnection.
  • Activists and journalists find their voices limited, especially during politically charged periods.
  • Citizens are excluded from conversations and accessing information that could help them make critical decisions that affect their livelihoods.
  • Students and educators experience setbacks in remote learning, particularly in under-resourced communities that rely on social media or messaging apps to coordinate learning.
  • Access to public services is disrupted, from health services to government updates and emergency communications.

A 2023 GSMA report showed that more than 50% of small businesses in Sub-Saharan Africa use social media for customer engagement. In countries such as Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya or South Africa, Facebook and Instagram are lifelines. Losing access even temporarily sets back innovation, erodes trust, and impacts livelihoods.

A Call for Continental Solutions

Africa’s digital future must not hinge on the whims of a single government or a foreign tech giant. Both states and companies should be accountable for protecting rights in digital contexts, ensuring that development and digitisation do not trample on dignity and equity. This requires:

  • Harmonised continental policies on data protection, content regulation, and digital trade.
  • Regional norm-setting mechanisms (like the African Union) to enforce accountability for both governments and corporations.
  • Investments in African tech platforms to offer resilient alternatives.
  • Public education on digital rights to empower users against abuse from both state and corporate actors.
  • Pan-African contextualised business and human rights frameworks to ensure that digital governance aligns with both local realities and global human rights standards. This includes the operationalisation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, following the examples of countries like Kenya, South Africa and Uganda, which have developed national action plans to embed human rights in corporate practice.

The stakes are high in the confrontation between Nigeria and Meta. If mismanaged, this tension could lead to fragmentation, exclusion, and setbacks for internet freedom, with ordinary users across the continent paying the price. To avoid this, the way forward must be grounded in the multistakeholder model of internet governance which aims for governments to regulate wisely and transparently, and for tech companies to respect local laws and communities, and for civil society to be actively engaged and vigilant. This will contribute to a future where the internet is open, secure, and inclusive and where innovation and justice thrive.