CIPESA Supports African Editors in Demands for Media Freedom, Information Integrity, and Data Access Rights

By Staff Writer |

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress 2026, held on February 23-24, 2026, assembled over 150 of Africa’s senior editors, newsroom leaders, and media executives from across the continent. The Congress sought to confront the various threats that contemporary journalism faces. A key theme emerging from deliberations was that in the age of artificial intelligence and the increasing concentration of power by platforms, journalism is more essential to democracy than it has ever been.

A communiqué emerging from the Congress articulated various arguments for reclaiming media value, rebuilding public trust, and redefining sustainable journalism in Africa’s increasingly digital landscape. The media is navigating an ever-changing information ecosystem where platform dominance, algorithmic opacity, media viability challenges, and the weaponisation of digital infrastructure itself have made the practice of independent journalism exponentially harder.

The Congress called for urgent structural reforms to safeguard information integrity and the sustainability of independent journalism in the face of platform dominance, fragile business models, and the rapid evolution of digital repression. These priorities align with the work of the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), which aims to promote the effective and inclusive use of ICT for improved governance and livelihoods in Africa.

During the Congress, CIPESA presented on the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Resolution 620: “Guidelines on Promoting and Harnessing Data Access for Advancing Human Rights in the Digital Age,” which establishes that journalists must have meaningful access to both public and platform-held data to conduct investigative reporting and hold power to account. The Congress’s communiqué reinforces this principle, recognising that data is indispensable for modern investigative journalism and democratic accountability.

Communiqué of the Inaugural Africa Editors Congress

Nairobi, Kenya | 5 March 2026

At a defining moment of profound transformation for journalism, democracy, and the global information ecosystem, editors and media leaders from across Africa convened in Nairobi for the inaugural Africa Editors Congress, organised by The African Editors Forum (TAEF) on February 23-24, 2026. Bringing together editorial leadership from diverse regions of Africa and the world, markets, and media traditions, the Congress marked a significant step toward building coordinated continental responses to the structural challenges reshaping journalism and public-interest information ecosystems.

Participants acknowledged that African journalism is confronting a convergence of pressures: platform dominance, rapid technological disruption, shifting audience behaviour, and fragile business models. Deliberations addressed both the economics and the practice of journalism, recognising that financial sustainability and editorial integrity are mutually reinforcing foundations of credible public-interest media. A central focus of the Congress was the growing impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism, and the urgent need to entrench ethical AI use in newsrooms while establishing fair and transparent compensation frameworks.

The Congress affirmed that independent journalism is an essential infrastructure for democratic and economic development. Markets, institutions, and public policy processes cannot function effectively without access to trusted information and data. The sustainability crisis confronting journalism, therefore, represents not only an industry challenge but a broader developmental risk for African economies and democratic processes.

Editors emphasised that rebuilding trust requires renewed commitment to strong professional practice alongside adaptation to a rapidly evolving information ecosystem. Participants recognised that public-interest content is increasingly produced beyond traditional newsroom structures, and that self-regulatory bodies should be broadened to include content creators committed to accountability, transparency, and accuracy while maintaining defined professional standards.

Participants expressed concern that existing copyright regimes were not designed for the large-scale extraction and use of journalistic content by generative AI systems. Discussions emphasised the need for rights-based approaches that secure equitable value for journalistic work, strengthen African agency within the global technology ecosystem, and address power imbalances between media organisations and dominant platforms. Competition-based remedies and coordinated regulatory approaches, such as the South African Competition Commission’s Media and Digital Platforms Market Inquiry report, were identified as important reference points for advancing sustainable outcomes in Africa.

Participants agreed that fragmented responses by individual African publishers or national markets are insufficient to address systemic challenges. Coalition-building and coordinated continental advocacy were identified as essential to shifting structural imbalances and ensuring that African perspectives shape global debates on media sustainability, technology governance, and information integrity. These include advancing normative frameworks such as the M20 Johannesburg Declaration and Resolutions 620, 630, and 631 of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), which carry direct implications for the path of African media within shifting technology ecosystems. Enhanced collaboration in policy-making processes is fundamental to building the African media’s agency in the global tech ecosystem and to strengthening public interest journalism on the continent. Delegates appreciate growing attention from the African Union (AU) on matters of media freedom, especially through the ACHPR, and propose more collaborative efforts between editors and the continental/regional and sub-regional mechanisms to promote media freedom and sustainability.

The Congress highlighted several areas of emerging consensus and ongoing work:

a)           Development of coordinated frameworks for collective engagement with global technology platforms, including approaches to fair compensation, bargaining power, and access to data.

b)          Advancement of public-interest-oriented regulatory frameworks aligned with digital realities and freedom of expression principles.

c)           Strengthening African editors’ societies as key institutional pillars for advocacy, coordination, and professional solidarity.

d)          Expansion of collaborative editorial strategies to improve coverage of emerging economic domains shaping Africa’s future, including technology and extractive sectors.

e)           Exploration of mechanisms to support small and community newsrooms through shared services, collaboration, and sustainable funding pathways.

f)            Continued dialogue on African-led funding approaches that reinforce editorial independence and long-term resilience.

Participants noted that existing continental mechanisms have not sufficiently prioritised coordinated responses to the structural challenges facing journalism. In this context, the Congress resolved that TAEF should be strengthened and properly resourced to serve as a central convening and coordinating platform capable of advancing shared priorities across the continent.

The Congress further resolved to:

i) Strengthen cross-border collaboration among African newsrooms and ethical public-interest content creators.

ii) Advance rights-based approaches to media regulation that protect freedom of expression and access to information while addressing harms within digital information environments.

iii) Promote high standards of journalistic practice that contribute to informed public discourse, accountable governance, and inclusive economic development.

iv) Facilitate evidence-based research, knowledge exchange, and capacity-building initiatives driven by African leadership.

v) Engage constructively with policymakers, regulators, civil society, and global partners to ensure African editorial perspectives inform governance debates shaping the future of information ecosystems.

vi) Journalism/media and communications training in colleges and universities should update and incorporate these resolutions into their professional training tool kit.

The inaugural Africa Editors Congress represents an important milestone toward building a unified, resilient, and forward-looking African public-interest media ecosystem grounded in collaboration, collective leadership, and shared responsibility for strengthening democratic and economic resilience across the continent.

Adopted in Nairobi, Kenya, on 24 February 2026

Endorsed by the following partners:

  • Media Leadership Think Tank, GIBS
  • Network of Independent Media Councils in Africa (NIMCA)
  • SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition
  • Wits Centre for Journalism, South Africa
  • Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)
  • M20

About The African Editors Forum (TAEF)

The Africa Editors Forum (TAEF) is a continental network of editors, senior newsroom leaders, and media executives committed to strengthening independent journalism and advancing media freedom across Africa. TAEF works to promote ethical standards, defend press freedom, deepen professional solidarity, and support editorial innovation in response to the evolving political, economic, and technological landscape shaping the continent. Through convenings such as the Africa Editors Congress and strategic partnerships with regional and global institutions, TAEF provides a platform for dialogue on journalism’s role in democracy, development, and African agency in emerging domains. The Forum also champions fair compensation for journalism as a public good, newsroom resilience in the digital age, and collaborative responses to threats facing journalists and media organisations. TAEF serves as a collective voice for Africa’s editors, advancing a journalism culture rooted in independence, public interest, and lasting excellence.

MOSIP Connect 2026 Calls for Scalable, Country-Driven Digital Public Infrastructure

By Milliam Murigi |

African governments have been urged to move beyond pilot projects and develop a Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) that is open, secure, nationally owned and capable of operating at a full national scale to truly serve citizens.

This call was made today in Morocco during the launch of the MOSIP Connect 2026 conference. Speaking at the event, Prof. Debabrata Das, Director of the International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) – Bangalore, emphasized that DPI cannot remain at the pilot stage indefinitely.

“DPI must be scaled to operate at national levels,” he said, highlighting that such systems are not just technology projects but national assets that underpin citizens’ access to services like education, health, social protection, and payments.

DPI refers to government-backed digital systems and platforms designed to provide citizens with secure, accessible, and efficient services. These systems include national digital IDs, e-government portals, digital payment platforms, and health and social service databases.

Across Africa, countries are making significant strides in implementing DPI, though progress varies widely. Ghana’s national ID system, the Ghana Card, has been linked to banking, mobile verification, and social services, while Rwanda has achieved over 90 percent coverage of adults with digital IDs integrated into multiple government services.

Kenya’s Maisha Namba program seeks to consolidate several identity databases into a single, unified platform. Despite these advances, many initiatives remain fragmented or confined to pilot projects, limiting their ability to deliver services nationwide.

Prof. Das stressed that for DPI to deliver real public value, it must be open-source, secure, respect national and data sovereignty, and be designed to evolve with changing policies, technologies, and citizen needs.

“DPI is not regular software development. When embraced, it becomes part of the relationship between citizens and the state. That means it must be based on evidence, transparency, accountability and continuous learning.”

According to him, six principles should guide next-generation DPI development: open-source technology, respect for national and data sovereignty, neutrality in partnerships, reusability of systems, commitment to national-scale deployment and the ability to evolve as policies, technologies and citizens’ needs change.

Additionally, he added that building successful national digital systems requires three elements working together: strong technology platforms and standards, governance structures that ensure accountability, and institutional and user capacity to adopt the systems. Without all three, pilot programs risk failing to scale.

“Data creates power. Countries must retain control over the data generated through digital systems. This is why sovereignty considerations are central to MOSIP’s approach when working with governments,” he added.

The Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP) a IIIT-Bangalore project, offers countries modular and open-source technology to build and own their national identity systems. The project aims to provide governments with the tools for meaningful digital transformation, established on a bedrock of good principles and human-centric design.

Speaking at the same event, Abdelhak Harrak, Director of Information Systems and Telecommunications, Ministry of the Interior, Kingdom of Morocco said that the success of a digital identification system does not rely solely on technical solutions, however advanced they may be, it also depends on strong governance and the sustained mobilization of teams responsible for rigorously managing complex transformations involving numerous field actors. It is this synergy that ensures both the security and the sustainability of a national identification system.

“Technology alone cannot drive change; it is the alignment of people, processes, and purpose that turns innovation into lasting impact,” said Harrak.

He also highlighted the role of private-sector and civil-society partners in building sustainable digital ecosystems. He described them as “essential” rather than peripheral, noting that innovation often comes from organizations that build localized solutions on top of open platforms.

This article was first published by Science Africa on February 12, 2026.

Strengthening Media Reporting on Digital Public Infrastructure in Eastern Africa

By Juliet Nanfuka |

On October 13-15, 2025, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), in partnership with Co-Develop hosted 20 journalists in a workshop as part of the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Journalism Fellowship for Eastern Africa. This is a regional initiative aimed at strengthening journalists’ capacity to report knowledgeably and critically on DPI and Digital Public Goods (DPGs) in the region.

The workshop took place in Nairobi, Kenya and brought together journalists from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda, who are receiving both knowledge-and skills-based training alongside a reporting grant to produce in-depth DPI stories.

At an inaugural virtual workshop held in August 2025, the Fellows examined among others, Digitalisation and digital rights in Eastern Africa; UN and African Union frameworks on DPI; the DPI ecosystem in Eastern Africa; and Media coverage of DPI across nine countries, based on CIPESA’s ongoing research. The workshop also provided practical training in journalism skills, including technology beat reporting, conceptualising story ideas, writing effective pitches, data storytelling, and the use of AI in storytelling.

Report Launch

Following the workshop, a regional public event was hosted on October 16, 2025, and served to showcase findings from a multi-country media monitoring study on DPI coverage conducted y CIPESA. 

The report presents the findings of a baseline study on media coverage of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Digital Public Goods (DPGs) across seven Eastern African countries in 2024: Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda. Using a mixed-methods approach that combined quantitative content analysis and key informant interviews, the study analysed 680 DPI- and DPG-related stories published in 28 major print and online outlets between January and December 2024. 

The study assessed the volume, prominence, themes, sourcing patterns, and framing of stories and complemented the findings with interviews and focus group discussions involving journalists, editors, and experts. The study reveals that while media in the region are actively reporting on digital transformation, the coverage is largely event-driven, government-centric, and male-dominated. It focuses primarily on the functional benefits of DPI—such as service delivery and innovation—while giving limited attention to critical issues of governance, data privacy, equity, and citizen inclusion.

Find the report summary here

The G20 Should Challenge the Power Dynamics in Digital Public Infrastructure

Juliet Nanfuka |

Data plays a crucial role in T20 discussions at the G20, influencing online interaction and civic engagement. The G20 should use its influence to create a multi-stakeholder agenda for Digital Public Infrastructure design.

Data is at the heart of T20 discussions around the G20, as it informs the architecture of online interaction, civic participation (and exclusion) and the governance of digital society. As such, it is also central to digital public infrastructure (DPI), serving as a foundational requirement and an enabler of new data generation and data mobility. Data drives the three key pillars of DPI – digital identification, digital payments and data exchange – in addition to other emerging features such as geospatial data and data aggregation. However, the expanding role of DPI raises questions about its alignment with constitutional guarantees, data protection frameworks and the lived realities of end users across Africa.

In 2023, India’s G20 presidency laid the foundation for discourse on DPI with great precision. A year later, the 2024 G20 Rio de Janeiro Leaders’ Declaration acknowledged ‘the contribution of digital public infrastructure to an equitable digital transformation’. It went on to note ‘the transformative power of digital technologies to bridge existing divides and empower societies and individuals including all women and girls and people in vulnerable situations. 

Consequently, DPI has been positioned as a necessary tool for international trade facilitation and industrialisation in developing countries. In Africa, this momentum has been supported by strategies such as the AU’s Digital Transformation Strategy for Africa (2020–2030), the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the 2024 adoption of the Continental AI Strategy. Various countries across the continent have integrated DPI into their national strategies.

The pace of DPI integration is mirrored by growing financial investment in DPI. Examples include the $200 million Ghana Digital Acceleration Project by the World Bank in 2022 to expand broadband access and strengthen digital innovation ecosystems. In June 2025, the AfCFTA Adjustment Fund Credit Facility funded $10 million to support private sector adaptation to AfCFTA frameworks, with initial commitments to Telecel Global Services to enhance connectivity and regional integration. The company provides wholesale voice and SMS services and enterprise connectivity solutions to more than 250 telecom operators across Africa and globally.

While the expansion of DPI is often framed as a progressive step, it also carries significant governance trade-offs. The expansion of DPI in countries with weak democratic safeguards heightens the risk of state overreach, mass surveillance and reduced civic freedoms, making it essential to set clear limits on state access to citizens’ data to safeguard participation and accountability. Further, concerns over data sovereignty also loom.

Other T20 commentaries have stressed the urgent need for multi-stakeholder engagement to align DPI with the realities of developing countries. Without this alignment, DPI could increase existing regulatory gaps that compromise civic rights and consumer protection, fraud prevention and privacy. Meanwhile, the current wave of DPI design could exclude smaller economies that lack the capacity to engage in complex cross-border arrangements, such as those established between India’s Unified Payments Interface and Singapore’s PayNow. However, efforts such as the East African Community’s Cross-Border Payment System Masterplan aimed at inclusive, secure, efficient and interoperable cross-border payments in the region are underway.

If DPI is deployed without further interrogation, especially within the contexts of lower-income and developing countries that are often still navigating authoritarian systems, there is a risk of introducing yet another form or layer of digital exclusion from the global ecosystem. This could amplify existing national exclusions emerging from lack of access to the basics promised by DPI, such as national identity documents as keys to financial inclusion or access to basic services and civic rights.

When governments replace human interaction with automated systems, they risk ignoring the real-life experiences and needs of people who use – or could use – DPI. Thus, while DPI is being positioned as a solution to the challenges many developing countries are facing, it is important to keep in mind that infrastructure is not neutral. Its built-in biases, risks and design choices will ultimately impact citizens. Thus, for the real impact of DPI to be realised, it is necessary for the G20 to address concerns on:

  • The power affordances embedded in DPI design. The architecture of DPI prioritises the interests of those who design and fund it. The G20 should require that DPI initiatives undergo power mapping to identify who holds decision-making authority, how data flows are controlled and which actors stand to benefit or be marginalised by the design and deployment of DPI.
  • The institutionalisation of regulatory sandboxing. Regulatory sandboxes offer a controlled, transparent environment where DPI tools and policies can be tested for fairness, legality, inclusivity and public interest alignment before full-scale implementation. The G20 should promote the use of regulatory sandboxes as a mechanism to scrutinise DPI systems and their governance frameworks.
  • Strengthen multi-stakeholder inclusion. DPI needs to be built with the participation of more stakeholders – including civil society, private sector actors, academia and marginalised communities – in decision-making. The G20 should use its convening power to set the multi-stakeholder agenda in the design of DPI interventions. 
  • Safeguard data sovereignty. African countries developing data governance frameworks need to balance sovereignty with interoperability, and prevent a dependency on foreign-controlled systems.
  • Enhance public awareness interventions. Despite significant DPI developments, many citizens remain unaware of their implications. The media plays a critical role in bridging this gap. There should be more integration with media partners in furthering public awareness of DPI, its functions and consequences. The G20 should not negate the role of the media in driving public awareness on DPI interventions.

This commentary was first published on the T20 website on October 06, 2025.

Meet the Next Generation of Journalists Covering Africa’s Digital Public Infrastructure

DPI Fellowship |

The Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA), in partnership with Co-Develop, is pleased to announce the inaugural cohort of Fellows selected for the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Journalism Fellowship for Eastern Africa following an open call in April 2025. 

This six-month regional fellowship aims to cultivate a new generation of journalists with the knowledge and skills to investigate and report on DPI and Digital Public Goods (DPGs). Fellows will participate in specialised training sessions, receive mentorship, and receive financial support to develop and produce impactful stories in diverse formats and languages. The stories will interrogate the development and deployment of DPI and DPGs with a focus on their implications for governance, inclusion, equity, and citizens’ everyday lives.

The fellowship brings together 20 journalists from nine countries (Burundi, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda) who work across online, broadcast, and print platforms.

The call in April attracted 214 applications, which were assessed through a rigorous selection process to identify fellows who demonstrated a strong interest and capacity to report on emerging digital public infrastructure issues with clarity, depth, and integrity. 

“This fellowship is about more than capacity building. It is about empowering African journalists to shape the public narrative around digital transformation in ways that reflect citizens’ rights, challenges, and aspirations,” said Dr. Wairagala Wakabi, CIPESA’s Executive Director. “We are thrilled to support these pioneering journalists as they lead the charge in demystifying digital infrastructure and holding power to account.”

The launch of this fellowship is significant as the digital transformation agenda of many African countries is evolving. Yet, media coverage of DPI and DPGs remains limited. The fellowship aims to close that gap by building the capacity of the media to cover DPI and DPI in ways that create awareness and informed public discourse on digital governance.

The fellowship is inspired by a similar Co-Develop-funded initiative implemented by the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), which supported fellows to produce over 100 impactful stories that spurred public debate and influenced policy.

At Co-Develop, we believe that sustainable digital public infrastructure requires more than innovation and technology, it demands informed ecosystems. By supporting journalists across nine East African countries, this fellowship helps create a critical layer of engagement and accountability around Digital Public Infrastructure. We’re proud to invest in a future where DPI is not only built, but deeply understood, safeguarded, and shaped by those it serves.
– Desire Kachenje, Senior Investment Principal, Co-Develop

Follow the Fellows’ Stories
Stay engaged with the work of the DPI Journalism Fellows throughout 2025 using the hashtags #DPIJournalism #DPIFellows2025. Follow their stories and insights via CIPESA and Co-Develop’s online platforms, and join the conversation on how digital public infrastructure is shaping the future of governance and inclusion in Africa.

Read more about the DPI Journalism Fellows 2025 here.